Re: [9fans] 9pi image

2016-07-27 Thread Tony
Richard Miller <9fans hamnavoe.com> writes: > > At long last the SDcard image in /n/sources/contrib/miller/9pi.img.gz > is up to date. Besides having support for Raspberry Pi 3 and Zero, it > is now much more robust running on multiple cores, and includes new > interfaces for GPIO, SPI and I2C

[9fans] Virtual Box 5.1 and Plan 9

2016-07-27 Thread Peter Hull
I've been using plan 9 on Virtual Box 5.0.x for a while and it's been running fine. However the latest update to 5.1 seems not to work. I want to try and sort this out but I need a bit of help on figuring out what's going during boot. On both Labs and 9front the booting just hangs somewhere after

[9fans] test

2016-07-27 Thread Friedrich Psiorz
test

[9fans] A write-up about an old Plan 9 vulnerability

2016-07-27 Thread Skip Tavakkolian
http://blog.securitymouse.com/2016/07/this-old-vulnerability-1-plan-9-devenv.html

Re: [9fans] Virtual Box 5.1 and Plan 9

2016-07-27 Thread cinap_lenrek
dont use vbox. each new vbox version breaks something. when i tried to update to the latest one on windows 7 vbox didnt start anymore after the installation. in the trash it goes. i will not test 9front under vbox anymore and not support it. use vmware or kvm/qemu. -- cinap

[9fans] Any demand for a supported Windows version of p9port?

2016-07-27 Thread Andrew Simmons
What the subject line says. This is not remotely intended to disrespect Sean Quinlan’s 9pm, or the guys who did pf9. I’m just asking because there are still chunks of p9p that I’d like to have under Windows. Some of the chunks I want (mostly the command line utilities, also sam, not so much acm

Re: [9fans] Any demand for a supported Windows version of p9port?

2016-07-27 Thread Chris McGee
I was thinking of using Cygwin to see would be capable of compiling p9p. Chris > On Jul 27, 2016, at 9:08 PM, Andrew Simmons wrote: > > What the subject line says. > > This is not remotely intended to disrespect Sean Quinlan’s 9pm, or the guys > who did pf9. I’m just asking because there are

Re: [9fans] Any demand for a supported Windows version of p9port?

2016-07-27 Thread Winston Kodogo
Hey Chris Cygwin is an option. Albeit one I wouldn’t use. The guys who did pf9 used mingw. Which I also wouldn’t use. I like MS Visual Studio with access to the native libraries on the platform of my choice - so colour me bigoted. I was kind of wondering if there was an option for people who li

Re: [9fans] Any demand for a supported Windows version of p9port?

2016-07-27 Thread Joseph Stewart
Which version of MS Visual Studio would you use? On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 6:41 PM, Winston Kodogo wrote: > Hey Chris > > Cygwin is an option. Albeit one I wouldn’t use. The guys who did pf9 used > mingw. Which I also wouldn’t use. I like MS Visual Studio with access to > the native libraries on t

Re: [9fans] Any demand for a supported Windows version of p9port?

2016-07-27 Thread Andrew Simmons
I'd use whichever version is the latest free one. VS2015 community edition is the one I use, but MS are still pretty good about backward compatibility, so any previous version should do. > On 28/07/2016, at 5:09 PM, Joseph Stewart wrote: > > Which version of MS Visual Studio would you use? >

Re: [9fans] Virtual Box 5.1 and Plan 9

2016-07-27 Thread Matthew Veety
I run 9front in virtualbox, and, while I totally agree that its a waste of time to test it because they *always* break something in vbox, you're pretty safe if you stay on the 4.3 series and 5.0 series (on my end: 4.3 on freebsd is tested and 5.0 on windows is tested). I know you don't get the late