I'm still seeing 'sources' and 9front sources.
In 9fron sources there are significant changes on lib9p
and those time stamp is younger than 2011.
Something important happened on 9P protocol
while I was peacefully sleeping?
Kenji
On Sun Apr 20 05:47:44 EDT 2014, kokam...@hera.eonet.ne.jp wrote:
> I'm still seeing 'sources' and 9front sources.
> In 9fron sources there are significant changes on lib9p
> and those time stamp is younger than 2011.
>
> Something important happened on 9P protocol
> while I was peacefully sleepin
9front adds a inferno inspired mechanism for handling
requests in parallel to the 9p service loop called
srvrelease()/srvacquire().
often explicitely breaking up your request handling into
separate processes and handing off a request to a process
seems overkill. instead, you can do a srvrelease()
> i used this to make usb drivers multithreaded. usb devs can
> be slow to respond or sometimes even hang. as the filesystem is
> bound onto /dev, a hanging usb device would hang all walks
> on /dev making the system unusable with a single threaded
> implementation. srvrelease()/srvacquire() made t
During the final step of the 9legacy install on an IBM Thinkpad T60 I get an
error saying that it fails to mount the 9fat partition and copy the files from
the /n/newfs directory. I did notice an earlier error where it failed to apply
dma to my hard drive, citing an I/O error. An error similar t
On Sun Apr 20 12:50:07 EDT 2014, j...@margolius.co.uk wrote:
> During the final step of the 9legacy install on an IBM Thinkpad T60 I
> get an error saying that it fails to mount the 9fat partition and copy
> the files from the /n/newfs directory. I did notice an earlier error
> where it failed to
It was in AHCI mode already so I've put the HDD into 'Compatibility Mode' if it
works I'll get back to you.
From: 9fans-boun...@9fans.net [9fans-boun...@9fans.net] on behalf of erik
quanstrom [quans...@quanstro.net]
Sent: 20 April 2014 18:08
To: 9fans@9fan
On Sun Apr 20 14:12:52 EDT 2014, j...@margolius.co.uk wrote:
> It was in AHCI mode already so I've put the HDD into 'Compatibility Mode' if
> it works I'll get back to you.
two possibilities. either your disk is actually ide (i wouldn't think so from
a quick look at the vintage), or that ahci dr
Compatibility Mode didn't work either so I'll try what you suggested.
From: 9fans-boun...@9fans.net [9fans-boun...@9fans.net] on behalf of erik
quanstrom [quans...@quanstro.net]
Sent: 20 April 2014 19:27
To: 9fans@9fans.net
Subject: Re: [9fans] FW: bootset
On Sun Apr 20 16:09:33 EDT 2014, j...@margolius.co.uk wrote:
> Compatibility Mode didn't work either so I'll try what you suggested.
my experience is that ahci works better. so if you're having
i/o errors with a sata device, it is often power mangement.
if you wanna try ahci on 9atom, that might
10 matches
Mail list logo
