On 04/03/2014 12:28, Steve Simon wrote:
And I hate its scroll button,
but I love its three buttons!
I hate scroll buttons too.
I was very happy when I discovered the dell DY651A mouse:
http://www8.hp.com/uk/en/products/oas/product-detail.html?oid=403895#!tab=features
also branded as IBM "M-U
Sorry, my suggested correction is still wrong. b[0] is the length of
the whole descriptor not the length of the string. So I suggest this
(I tested it on exactly one device) -
static char*
mkstr(uchar *b, int n)
{
Rune r;
char *us;
char *s;
char *e;
if(n <
Apologies for last message, it was meant to be directed to quans...@quanstro.net
as part of a conversation. Please ignore.
I wouldn't spend time on this ... there are many better & cheaper choices of
keyboard
to use with plan 9.
On Wed Mar 5 06:02:56 EST 2014, 9f...@hamnavoe.com wrote:
> I wouldn't spend time on this ... there are many better & cheaper
> choices of keyboard to use with plan 9.
since it's not clear to me what the issue is, and setaddress returns a
transaction error, i was going on the assumption that the
> since it's not clear to me what the issue is, and setaddress returns a
> transaction error, i was going on the assumption that there was
> something slightly off about ehci setup. is this a bad assumption?
I think it is. Transaction error covers a multitude of sins. If you
suspect ehci, try t
> > since it's not clear to me what the issue is, and setaddress returns a
> > transaction error, i was going on the assumption that there was
> > something slightly off about ehci setup. is this a bad assumption?
>
> I think it is. Transaction error covers a multitude of sins. If you
> suspect
> usbotg: ep9.0 error intr 0082
> /boot/usbd: /dev/usb/ep8.0: port 3: attach setaddress: i/o error
0082 is a transaction error - so the problem wasn't in the ehci layer.
On 03/04/2014 12:19 AM, Alexandru Gheorghe wrote:
> On 03/03/2014 10:53 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
>>
>> On Mar 3, 2014, at 12:52, Alexandru Gheorghe wrote:
>>
>>> should we gather some configuration steps/examples for known stable
>>> builds of vbox and post them in a wiki somewhere(?)
>>
>> Yes
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Alexandru Gheorghe
wrote:
> On 03/04/2014 12:19 AM, Alexandru Gheorghe wrote:
>> On 03/03/2014 10:53 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mar 3, 2014, at 12:52, Alexandru Gheorghe wrote:
>>>
should we gather some configuration steps/examples for known stable
On 03/05/2014 10:23 PM, Alexandru Gheorghe wrote:
> On 03/04/2014 12:19 AM, Alexandru Gheorghe wrote:
>> On 03/03/2014 10:53 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mar 3, 2014, at 12:52, Alexandru Gheorghe wrote:
>>>
should we gather some configuration steps/examples for known stable
bui
On Wed, Mar 5, 2014 at 8:23 PM, Alexandru Gheorghe
wrote:
> Hmm, actually related to this, I encounter dhcprecv read timed out.
I got those kind of errors for every type of network card apart from
'Intel PRO/1000 Server (82545EM)' Which one are you using?
Pete
On 03/05/2014 10:43 PM, Peter Hull wrote:
> NAT network, Intel PRO/1000 MT Server (82545EM)
so it seems this nic model works best with Plan9 within VirtualBox
> PIIX3 chipset
and this as well
thanks!
--
; Alexandru Gheorghe
; alghe.global {at} gmail {dot} com
; OpenPGP key ID 0xCAF985D2
signat
13 matches
Mail list logo
