[9fans] drawterm osx-x11 on x86_64

2013-11-21 Thread Mark van Atten
For the record---to compile drawterm (http://code.google.com/p/drawterm/) with CONF=osx-x11 on x86_64 (in my case running 10.8.5), just add the required substitution to the makefile: Make.osx-x11 20 - arch=`uname -m|sed 's/i.86/386/;s/Power Macintosh/power/'`; \ 20 + arch=`uname -m|sed 's/i.86/38

Re: [9fans] acme/sam language question

2013-11-21 Thread Mark van Atten
> I finally get around to trying this out and (so far) it seems to work. > Thank you! You're welcome! Opening the group at the end of the first line has the effect of replacing the empty command and its implied p; see sam's man page under `Miscellany'. This also explains why your lines, without t

Re: [9fans] drawterm osx-x11 on x86_64

2013-11-21 Thread erik quanstrom
On Thu Nov 21 09:59:42 EST 2013, j...@corpus-callosum.com wrote: > > On Nov 21, 2013, at 4:40 AM, Mark van Atten wrote: > > > For the moment, I prefer this to drawterm-cocoa because there is no > > flicker, and window borders remain intact when reshaping with B1 or > > B2. > > Ah, but with draw

Re: [9fans] drawterm osx-x11 on x86_64

2013-11-21 Thread Jeff Sickel
On Nov 21, 2013, at 4:40 AM, Mark van Atten wrote: > For the moment, I prefer this to drawterm-cocoa because there is no > flicker, and window borders remain intact when reshaping with B1 or > B2. Ah, but with drawterm-cocoa you get proper rio resizing, which I find very useful when using multi

Re: [9fans] drawterm osx-x11 on x86_64

2013-11-21 Thread Steven Stallion
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Mark van Atten wrote: > For the moment, I prefer this to drawterm-cocoa because there is no > flicker, and window borders remain intact when reshaping with B1 or > B2. Ah! That drives me nuts too, though it is nice to get proper fullscreen support. I've submitted

Re: [9fans] drawterm osx-x11 on x86_64

2013-11-21 Thread Jeff Sickel
On Nov 21, 2013, at 9:03 AM, Steven Stallion wrote: > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 4:40 AM, Mark van Atten > wrote: >> For the moment, I prefer this to drawterm-cocoa because there is no >> flicker, and window borders remain intact when reshaping with B1 or >> B2. > > Ah! That drives me nuts too,

Re: [9fans] acme/sam language question

2013-11-21 Thread Rudolf Sykora
On 6 November 2013 21:42, Mark van Atten wrote: > I write the script like this: > > /A/+#0;/B/-#0 { > g/CC/ s/CC/DD/g > } > p I finally get around to trying this out and (so far) it seems to work. Thank you! Ruda

Re: [9fans] drawterm osx-x11 on x86_64

2013-11-21 Thread Jeff Sickel
Just don’t upgrade to 10.9 yet: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT5293?viewlocale=en_US&locale=en_US http://xquartz.macosforge.org/landing/ You can install XQuartz and keep going, but the upgrade from earlier releases does delete X11 rather ruthlessly. -jas On Nov 21, 2013, at 9:03 AM, Steven Sta

Re: [9fans] f2c issue

2013-11-21 Thread Fausto Saporito
Hi Jens, thanks a lot!!! that site is wonderful :-D regards, Fausto 2013/11/21 Jens Staal > On Thursday 21 November 2013 17:50:50 Fausto Saporito wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > i'm trying to compile f2c (downloaded from NETLIB), under latest Plan9 > > installed under VirtualBox. > > Running a

[9fans] f2c issue

2013-11-21 Thread Fausto Saporito
Hello all, i'm trying to compile f2c (downloaded from NETLIB), under latest Plan9 installed under VirtualBox. Running arithchk I receive: arithchk 283: suicide: sys: fp: stack overflow fppc=0xbfff status=0x pc=0x12ea The emulated CPU is the same of the host CPU: INTEL i7. Was somebo

Re: [9fans] f2c issue

2013-11-21 Thread Jens Staal
On Thursday 21 November 2013 17:50:50 Fausto Saporito wrote: > Hello all, > > i'm trying to compile f2c (downloaded from NETLIB), under latest Plan9 > installed under VirtualBox. > Running arithchk I receive: > > arithchk 283: suicide: sys: fp: stack overflow fppc=0xbfff > status=0x pc=0x