Re: [9fans] Fossil disk usage over 100%?

2013-05-31 Thread David du Colombier
> main: df > main: 557,539,328 used + 35,184,325,517,312 free = 510,967,808 > (109.1% used) > > I thought the large number was my disk space including venti. Looking > more closely, I certainly don't have 35 terabytes hiding anywhere. The "large number" simply come from total - used when used > t

Re: [9fans] Fossil disk usage over 100%?

2013-05-31 Thread James Chapman
i On 31 May 2013 11:36, "David du Colombier" <0in...@gmail.com> wrote: > > main: df > > main: 557,539,328 used + 35,184,325,517,312 free = 510,967,808 > > (109.1% used) > > > > I thought the large number was my disk space including venti. Looking > > more closely, I certainly don't have 35 terabyt

Re: [9fans] Fossil disk usage over 100%?

2013-05-31 Thread James Chapman
Z On 31 May 2013 11:36, "David du Colombier" <0in...@gmail.com> wrote: > > main: df > > main: 557,539,328 used + 35,184,325,517,312 free = 510,967,808 > > (109.1% used) > > > > I thought the large number was my disk space including venti. Looking > > more closely, I certainly don't have 35 terabyt

Re: [9fans] Fossil disk usage over 100%?

2013-05-31 Thread Steven Stallion
Purely anecdotal, but I've found that after setting up venti for a long-lived fossil (approximately 9 months), re-initializing based on the latest vac cleared up various bits of weirdness. YMMV. On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Jeremy Jackins wrote: > Hi 9fans, > > I recently set up my fossil t

Re: [9fans] Fossil disk usage over 100%?

2013-05-31 Thread Kurt H Maier
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:53:03PM -0700, Steven Stallion wrote: > long-lived fossil (approximately 9 months) :)

Re: [9fans] Fossil disk usage over 100%?

2013-05-31 Thread Steven Stallion
Alright. That's fair. I probably even walked into that. I suspect it's probably an artifact of any serious filesystem I use on a daily basis (*cough*) measured in years are all based on 64-bit Ken's. Fossil still feels foreign to me, though I'm attempting to change that. On Fri, May 31, 2013 at

Re: [9fans] Fossil disk usage over 100%?

2013-05-31 Thread Matthew Veety
> Fossil still feels foreign to me, though I'm attempting to change that. You misspelled unstable. You have more sack than I could ever say I have for putting anything mildly important on fossil.

Re: [9fans] Fossil disk usage over 100%?

2013-05-31 Thread erik quanstrom
> I suspect it's probably an artifact of any serious filesystem I use on a > daily basis (*cough*) measured in years are all based on 64-bit Ken's. > Fossil still feels foreign to me, though I'm attempting to change that. ken's file server sure has that industrial-strength feel, doesn't it? http:

Re: [9fans] Fossil disk usage over 100%?

2013-05-31 Thread Richard Miller
> You misspelled unstable. You have more sack than I could ever say I have for > putting anything mildly important on fossil. Nonsense. I've been using fossil on my main system since 2008, and on a thinkpad which I used daily when working at clients' offices for some years before that. My profe