my terminal runs a plan 9 also with
those bits. dont worry.
On May 26, 2013, at 8:00 AM, lu...@proxima.alt.za wrote:
>> give us a bit more time and we will put
>> the new bits somewhere.
>
> You are back-porting this to the Bell Labs distribution, I hope?
>
>
> ++L
>
Hello,
thanks to geoff and others, we can now connect to linux using ssh in official
distribution from bell-labs.
term% ssh -r arisawa@hebe
Welcome to Ubuntu 12.04.2 LTS (GNU/Linux 3.2.0-38-generic-pae i686)
* Documentation: https://help.ubuntu.com/
Last login: Sun May 26 11:00:17 2013 from
> I don't understand the difference of ssh server between linux and osx.
> any suggestion is welcome.
> anyone get connected to mac using ssh of Plan9?
I can't answer that. Is it possible for you to run sshd on the iMAC
with debug options? That will give you at least some hints on where
the prob
the mac only enables "keyboard interactive" auth and not "password" auth,
these are very similar but different. you need to an option in a config file
on the mac to enable password auth.
i have done this on my mac, but to be honest i cannot remember what i did.
i found it on google somewhere and
> the mac only enables "keyboard interactive" auth and not "password" auth,
> these are very similar but different. you need to an option in a config file
> on the mac to enable password auth.
Based on the Unixes I'm familiar with, the sshd config file is in
/etc/ssh and is unusual in that it doe
C, public domain, no external deps.
1) https://bitbucket.org/ftrvxmtrx/xmpp
Xmpp client. Supports multi-user chat and basic roster management.
To compile on bell labs version, comment out xmpp.c:/Blethal, which is
9front specific, afaik.
2) https://bitbucket.org/ftrvxmtrx/cflood
Flood-It/Color
On May 26, 2013, at 1:57, lu...@proxima.alt.za wrote:
> It is unreasonable to expect a community to contribute to the
> development of Plan 9 if the goal posts move with the fashion...
You may agree or not with Erik's position, but this is an unreasonable
characterization of it. It actually feel
> On May 26, 2013, at 1:57, lu...@proxima.alt.za wrote:
>
>> It is unreasonable to expect a community to contribute to the
>> development of Plan 9 if the goal posts move with the fashion...
>
> You may agree or not with Erik's position, but this is an
> unreasonable characterization of it. It a