Re: [9fans] Mini PCs

2012-06-15 Thread Comeau At9Fans
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote: > On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 18:19:20 -0400 > Comeau At9Fans wrote: > > > Ok, so, unless I was asleep at the wheel following these > > discussions, there's been a few "mini PCs" to come about lately: > > > > * Raspberry Pi > > * Cotton Candy >

Re: [9fans] Mini PCs

2012-06-15 Thread Comeau At9Fans
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:46 AM, erik quanstrom wrote: > > I think three including me actually. The drivers factor might only make > it > > a good cpu server methinks. I would totally love one as a terminal > though. > > sadly, the 10/100 ethernet is provided through a flakey usb hub > (http://ww

Re: [9fans] Mini PCs

2012-06-15 Thread Comeau At9Fans
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 5:07 PM, John Floren wrote: > ...As for > anything not based on the supported SoCs, well, until people stop > sitting on ass saying "boy that would be a nice terminal" and actually > start PORTING the damn thing, it'll never be more than Yet Another > 120-message 9fans Thr

Re: [9fans] Mini PCs

2012-06-15 Thread Comeau At9Fans
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Kurt H Maier wrote: > Evaluations of the Sheevaplug in particular revealed it tended to > overheat badly if you put any significant load on the networking > components. Heating problems combined with poor quality control would > be my guess as to why that whole t

Re: [9fans] Mini PCs

2012-06-15 Thread Comeau At9Fans
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:05 AM, Nick LaForge wrote: > Sure. But the Sheevaplug (same SoC) is now 3 years old, and it looks > like the whole 'plug-computer' thing never took off. Since phones > seem to be the only consistent market for fast Arm SoCs, we're likely > to see one with usb3 before g