I'm now learning o/mero and o/live, and found very interesting!
I feel this is a direct descent of Plan 9 concepts. The idea to
separate o/mero and o/live is your original, and sounds very good
idea to me. Congraturations! Nemo and friends.
A few questions:
1) In a directory panel, is it diffi
4) Why I cannot run inferno applications, such as charon
during o/mero and o/live is running. I got
wmlib: no draw context error.
Kenji
> % mk install
> ...
> cd libmach
> 6c -FTVw -I/sys/src/cmd (2 5 7 8 q u)^.c
> u.c:7 6c: '/sparc64' file does not exist: /sparc64/include/ureg.h
> ...
> %
There is obviously a problem on your Plan 9 installation.
The file /sparc64/include/ureg.h shouldn't be missing,
and is a requirement to build
>
> 1) In a directory panel, is it difficult to make distinguish directory
> and files like acme?
yes, names are listed. that's all
> 2) Is it difficult to reflect the change, say create a file etc, the
> content of directory panel?
You have to reopen the dir.
Button 3 click on the name, then
On Apr 22, 2012, at 9:55 AM, kokam...@hera.eonet.ne.jp wrote:
> 4) Why I cannot run inferno applications, such as charon
> during o/mero and o/live is running. I got
> wmlib: no draw context error.
>
> Kenji
>
You can run emu apps, but there is no graphics context.
So you can't run inferno g
So, a month has gone by and a slice of raspberry pi is looking more and more
tempting these days, especially since "official" delivery seems to have
happened last week. Has anyone yet chanced an introduction of one to plan9? I
would guess the initial booting would be the biggest hurdle. What too
> So, a month has gone by and a slice of raspberry pi is looking more and
> more tempting these days, especially since "official" delivery seems to
> have happened last week. Has anyone yet chanced an introduction of one
> to plan9? I would guess the initial booting would be the biggest
> hurdle.
It's not easy even if you make appliances and sell a good number of their
NICs. At a company where I worked a few years ago, we had a performance
problem and it took us months to get any datasheets. When that didn't help,
it took us about the same amount of time to get errata.
It is not fun.
--dh
On Apr 22, 2012, at 11:22 AM, Devon H. O'Dell wrote:
> It's not easy even if you make appliances and sell a good number of their
> NICs. At a company where I worked a few years ago, we had a performance
> problem and it took us months to get any datasheets. When that didn't help,
> it took us
I always hope to see things like this appearing as the McGuffin in films:
"The Broadcom Errata"
(``Look! I've decoded the cryptogram in the K&R Code. It seems to give the
location of a Broadcom data sheet.
We thought they'd all been lost or destroyed!'' ``If it also has the
errata, it would be pric
On 22/04/2012, David du Colombier <0in...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> % mk install
>> ...
>> cd libmach
>> 6c -FTVw -I/sys/src/cmd (2 5 7 8 q u)^.c
>> u.c:7 6c: '/sparc64' file does not exist: /sparc64/include/ureg.h
>> ...
>> %
>
> There is obviously a problem on your Plan 9 installation.
>
> The file /s
Sign me up as a reviewer for your next theatrical production. A little
radio, streaming audio, or even a youtube screening will suffice.
On Apr 22, 2012, at 11:22 AM, Charles Forsyth wrote:
> I always hope to see things like this appearing as the McGuffin in films:
> "The Broadcom Errata"
> (``L
Glenda Python and the Search for the Holy Broadcom Specs
On Apr 22, 2012 1:42 PM, "Jeff Sickel" wrote:
> Sign me up as a reviewer for your next theatrical production. A little
> radio, streaming audio, or even a youtube screening will suffice.
>
> On Apr 22, 2012, at 11:22 AM, Charles Forsyth wr
On Apr 22, 2012, at 8:47 AM, Jeffrey Green wrote:
> I'm assuming the proprietary stuff that is the hurdle here is a ROM based
> boot sequence (and language). I would think that the ARM processor
> architecture is standard. If so about the ROM, is the general public
> completely in the dark abou
On 22/04/2012, Jeff Sickel wrote:
> Sign me up as a reviewer for your next theatrical production. A little
> radio, streaming audio, or even a youtube screening will suffice.
>
> On Apr 22, 2012, at 11:22 AM, Charles Forsyth wrote:
>
>> I always hope to see things like this appearing as the McGuf
The whole Broadcom licensing thing is a major pain at my current job
(although my overlords probably have equally painful legal shackles).
Not being able to see data sheets is pretty lame.
-joe
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 8:22 AM, Strake wrote:
> On 22/04/2012, Jeff Sickel wrote:
> > Sign me up a
On Apr 2, 8:31 pm, lyn...@orthanc.ca (Lyndon Nerenberg) wrote:
> On 2012-04-02, at 7:27 PM, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote:
>
> > I haven't tried genning up a CPU kernel with the new factotum yet.
>
> Sorry, I meant to say "with Richard's patched original factotum."
(if there is a double-post in play or in
"John Connor uses his 26th century technology to travel back in time,
insisting that Sarah's destiny will be thwarted if she does not take
the errata to the desert. They blow things up - not many dead. Sarah
latches onto a Cyborg open wifi and summons - a sequel."
On 23 April 2012 09:53, Joseph St
> The second issue that I have been meaning to ask the list is about pcc
> and bitfields - are they supported or is this some sort of can of
> worms I have stepped into?
>
I have just hit another "pcc can not initialize bitfields" problem
with netsurf libcss. If anyone know how to tackle that issu
19 matches
Mail list logo
