> Oddly enough, that idea does not come with the rider, "And then force
> Peter to use the library exclusively". I somehow doubt that acme will
[snip]
Be sure I will never downgrade to bells and whistles that add no
functionality, hewever, others would.hen rewrite every other's program
UI?
:-)
Be
The Python libraries expect an APE environment, and that assumption is
deeply built in to it.
The previous attempt to do a so-called "native" port ended up writing large
chunks of APE in Python,
which was a bit of a waste of time, or it couldn't run all the existing
things, such as Mercurial.
Using
> I believe the biggest sore spot is the lack of a modern Python port.
+1.
particularly one that compiles on every architechture. the current code
has a few mistakes like defining FPINVAL (depending on the architecture)
instead of including float.h.
> Ideally we could have a more complete por
call me today. 815 715 9180.
- erik
> call me today.
the guys in dark suits are here to take away my
email card ...
sorry for the spam.
- erik
> On Mar 13, 2012, at 11:42 PM, Anthony Sorace wrote:
>
> >> I'd suggest to complete native SSH2 implementation.
> >
> > This has obvious utility, but I'm hesitant to add it without a
> > mentor who can vouch for its suitability for a summer-sized
> > student project, and who'd be willing to ment
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Jeff Sickel wrote:
> Do you see this as a potential GSoC effort? The sans-ape version,
> build based off CPython 2.7 or 3.x? There are more dependencies
> than just Python, but if we did have this updated then there would be
> more opportunity for people to expe
Speaking of which... what would be the trick to make libsec visible
for an APE source?
--
- Yaroslav
Today I was driving long time to my working place and I had time to think about realizing projects at Plan 9 / Octopus base.
First I realize practically, that I will have more than one octopus PC the same as I have more than one Mac-Server today.
There are different contexts of usage and you will n
> >> I'd suggest to complete native SSH2 implementation.
> >
> > ...
>
> Let's not take this one completely off the table yet. SSHv2
> would be extremely useful in helping open up communication
> with external systems again.
As Erik said, there is a substantial effort here, probably
more than w
On Wed Mar 14 14:03:34 EDT 2012, blstu...@bellsouth.net wrote:
> > >> I'd suggest to complete native SSH2 implementation.
> > >
> > > ...
> >
> > Let's not take this one completely off the table yet. SSHv2
> > would be extremely useful in helping open up communication
> > with external systems a
May I suggest to add an "easy" project to the list: review Plan9
installation.
The "howto install without" (explaining how to create a Plan9 realm
from another OS if the CD can not be used) that I posted a while
ago did not attract a lot of attention. But dealing with the install,
I saw many detai
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:03 PM, wrote:
> May I suggest to add an "easy" project to the list: review Plan9
> installation.
>
> The "howto install without" (explaining how to create a Plan9 realm
> from another OS if the CD can not be used) that I posted a while
> ago did not attract a lot of att
for me very interesting question:
who use a Plan 9 system productive?
who use it for research?
who use it just because bored with Linux as a tec gaming site?
who use it commercial in a business?
who use it on an embedded device?
who programs with limbo?
what else?
At least in the past, I'm sure I followed a discussion that the summer of
code was intended (ie, required) to produce code,
not documentation or packaging, although that might have changed.
On 14 March 2012 19:38, John Floren wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:03 PM, wrote:
> > May I suggest
On Mar 14, 2012, at 18:15 , Charles Forsyth wrote:
> At least in the past, I'm sure I followed a discussion that the summer of
> code was intended (ie, required) to produce code, not documentation
> or packaging, although that might have changed.
This is true. All projects in GSoC are required to
Sending from phone, please pardon errors.
There are projects that use gsoc for docs and the like. I would see nothing
wrong with someone contributing code to the installer -- especially someone
with less familiarity with p9 than most 9fans -- they will likely taake
longer than 1-2 weeks. Additiona
17 matches
Mail list logo