Just a quick question for other users of ARM based machines:
Should the ape/lib/openssl be ignored for ARM, or is there a decent alternative
for objtype=arm when trying to
build it? The current build fails as /sys/include/ape/openssl/opensslconf.h
errors out with 'unknown objtype'.
Otherwise,
I'm working on a file system that will keep most of the tree in memory
at all times (in fact, the "active" tree is only in memory). It archives frozen
temporary copies to a disk partition until it gets full (in which case the
oldest
is discarded) and an external program is going to make permanent
While hitting some ape pcc errors while building my arm tree,
I realized that zlib was quite a bit out of date. The latest
zlib-1.2.6 can be pulled down and installed in
/sys/src/cmd/gs/zlib
You'll need to remove gzio.c if you didn't do a complete replace,
and then modify the following:
don't forget to update /sys/include/ape/zlib.h
On Feb 7, 2012, at 3:50 PM, Jeff Sickel wrote:
> don't forget to update /sys/include/ape/zlib.h
And for /sys/src/cmd/gs:
% diffy mkfile src/ld.tr
diff /n/dump/2012/0207/sys/src/cmd/gs/mkfile mkfile
141c141
< $CC $CFLAGS zlib/$stem.c; mv $stem.$O obj
---
> $CC $CFLAGS -D_C99_SNPRINT
>
> Now gs builds (untested) on/for arm.
gs already built/works on arm. did someone break it?
it is too slow to use, though. does anyone know what's
wrong with gs on amd64?
- erik
On Feb 7, 2012, at 6:21 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
>>
>> Now gs builds (untested) on/for arm.
>
> gs already built/works on arm. did someone break it?
> it is too slow to use, though. does anyone know what's
> wrong with gs on amd64?
not sure, but it as also failing to build for 386 even
with
On Feb 7, 2012, at 8:48 PM, Jeff Sickel wrote:
>
> On Feb 7, 2012, at 6:21 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
>
>>>
>>> Now gs builds (untested) on/for arm.
>>
>> gs already built/works on arm. did someone break it?
>> it is too slow to use, though. does anyone know what's
>> wrong with gs on amd64?
On Feb 7, 2012, at 8:52 PM, Jeff Sickel wrote:
>
> On Feb 7, 2012, at 8:48 PM, Jeff Sickel wrote:
>
>>
>> On Feb 7, 2012, at 6:21 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
>>
Now gs builds (untested) on/for arm.
>>>
>>> gs already built/works on arm. did someone break it?
>>> it is too slow to u
