Re: [9fans] exportfs / u9fs / v9fs / npfs / spfs versus 9vx

2011-05-21 Thread Steve Simon
> > I put the OSX launchd ritual on the wiki a couple of years ago. > > and here it is: > http://www.plan9.bell-labs.com/wiki/plan9/9pfs.plist/index.html Ugh, that has been throughly eaten by the wiki formatting, I think this is the bit I added: http://www.plan9.bell-labs.com/wiki/plan9/Int

Re: [9fans] a pair nec bugs

2011-05-21 Thread Charles Forsyth
the most straightforward fix for nsec is to change it back to do the obvious thing: open the file, read in the time data, close the file and return the value. we might like to add the cache back in, since a grep of /sys/src/cmd suggests that it might be useful to do that. most programs were fine w

Re: [9fans] a pair nec bugs

2011-05-21 Thread erik quanstrom
> we've had several attempts at trying to guess in the library's > guts when the cached value(s) have gone wrong, but they haven't worked > because there are too many cases and the library function can't detect them > precisely > if at all. also, using the current process as the cache key probably

[9fans] Calendar for your next "last" doom days?

2011-05-21 Thread tlaronde
Since I have noticed that all the lists I'm subscribed to are almost silent, and since north america generates the majority of the traffic on these lists, I suspect there is something to do with "yours" doom days. Could US citizens provide a calendar about the next "final days" so that one can rem

Re: [9fans] a pair nec bugs

2011-05-21 Thread erik quanstrom
> syslog, times and truerand(!) also would benefit. > of all of them so far, only times(2) really is per-process. and time(2). - erik

Re: [9fans] a pair nec bugs

2011-05-21 Thread Charles Forsyth
>and time(2). i didn't include that because it calls nsec

Re: [9fans] a pair nec bugs

2011-05-21 Thread erik quanstrom
On Sat May 21 18:12:35 EDT 2011, fors...@terzarima.net wrote: > >and time(2). > > i didn't include that because it calls nsec time calls an internal function, oldtime(), that adds another private file descriptor. i suppose that could be killed off by now. - erik