Greate example ! :) Thanks :)
2011/4/29 Benjamin Huntsman :
>>Investigating the possibility of replacing the MS DNS on Plan9 DNS,not found
>>in the man ndb mention of records of type SRV.
>>It is necessary to support Microsoft Active Directory. Maybe I missed
>>something?
>>http://en.wikipedia.o
> [1] For those gnashing teeth over glibc - might want to check out
> musl libc. It's no plan 9 libc, but it's definitely "less worse" than glibc.
``News: As of version 0.7.7, musl has been successfully bootstrapped by a
third-party system integrator.''
hmm. they had to do more than just compil
> complaining is because you _need_ linux... to furnish all the things
> you can't do with plan 9 - either personally, or within your organization.
it's true, but at least i haven't got to run either Windows or MacOS.
the underlying problem is that the things we might simply import (mainly
brows
On Friday 29 of April 2011 11:18:26 Charles Forsyth wrote:
> > complaining is because you _need_ linux... to furnish all the things
> > you can't do with plan 9 - either personally, or within your
> > organization.
>
> it's true, but at least i haven't got to run either Windows or MacOS.
> the und
>let's abstract away differences between platforms
but they don't `abstract away': they enumerate them.
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 11:12:55AM +0200, dexen deVries wrote:
>
> qmake (Qt's makefile generator) is mostly reasonable IMHO. consists of one
> program (the qmake) which reads a rather simple project description
> (<>.pro) plus a bunch of platform description files
> (/usr/lib{,64}/qt/mkspec/<>
On Friday 29 of April 2011 11:44:31 tlaro...@polynum.com wrote:
> I don't know if there are black holes in the nature. But for sure mob
> programming has managed to create computer ones; projects so bloated
> that they are absorbing all the resources around with an emitted service
> dimming more an
On Friday, April 29, 2011 02:04:26 AM Charles Forsyth wrote:
> > [1] For those gnashing teeth over glibc - might want to check out
> > musl libc. It's no plan 9 libc, but it's definitely "less worse" than
> > glibc.
>
> ``News: As of version 0.7.7, musl has been successfully bootstrapped by a
> t
On Apr 29, 2011 6:21 AM, "errno" wrote:
>
> On Friday, April 29, 2011 02:04:26 AM Charles Forsyth wrote:
> > > [1] For those gnashing teeth over glibc - might want to check out
> > > musl libc. It's no plan 9 libc, but it's definitely "less worse" than
> > > glibc.
> >
> > ``News: As of version 0
> But then again, why would anyone want a fully functional web experience
> on Plan 9 - what would be the purpose? Apparently nobody does, otherwise
> it'd be implemented already.
that's not logical.
and from another post
> Until then, complaining about de-facto linux bloat is a lot like co
On 27 Apr 2011, at 6:47 pm, Anthony Sorace wrote:
• Unification of X11 code and wsys device, by Jesús Galán López [1]
[...]
[1] http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/
gsoc2011/yiyus/1
I'm a bit curious about this one but all I get from the link is "This
proposal is n
I remember hearing that some of the lenovo's thinkpads have good plan 9
support. Does anyone have a list of laptop models that are known to
work with at least the basics (video, net, and maybe even sound)?
Thanks,
EBo --
I took your example without any changes. But unfortunately it still does not
return the correct value of srv hostname ...
For example:
C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator>nslookup
Default Server: rit.com
Address: 192.168.0.190
> server 192.168.0.193
> set q=srv
> _ldap._tcp.testad.test.local
S
2011/4/29 Ethan Grammatikidis :
>
> On 27 Apr 2011, at 6:47 pm, Anthony Sorace wrote:
>>
>> • Unification of X11 code and wsys device, by Jesús Galán López [1]
>
> [...]
>>
>> [1]
>> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2011/yiyus/1
>
> I'm a bit curious about this one but
On 28 Apr 2011, at 1:11 pm, Digby Tarvin wrote:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 11:58:01AM +0200, Peter A. Cejchan wrote:
spaces in filenames.. does not it break the rules?? Who actually
needs
them??
Well, for one thing it's much more natural to type a space than a
hyphen or an underscore. For a
On 29 Apr 2011, at 2:22 pm, yy wrote:
You can read a short abstract here:
http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/project/google/gsoc2011/yiyus/22001
The main idea is to avoid the duplication of xlib dependent code in
inferno, p9p, 9vx and drawterm and write a wsys device to use the
window manager
On Apr 29, 2011, at 8:43 AM, Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
>
> On 27 Apr 2011, at 6:47 pm, Anthony Sorace wrote:
>>
>> • Unification of X11 code and wsys device, by Jesús Galán López [1]
> [...]
>>
>> [1]
>> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/gsoc2011/yiyus/1
>
> I'm a bi
On Apr 29, 2011, at 4:54 AM, dexen deVries wrote:
> at any rate, `code removed is code debugged' is very true, but that's not
> something easily put on CV or boasted to friends.
An alternative version, `deleted code is debugged code', has been used very
successfully by myself and other collea
> Parsing the output of programs which return filenames is the only
> common case where I see any complexity from spaces, and then the
> complexity only consists of setting and reverting $ifs. Granted that
> could be smoother still, especially where you want a big file list in
> for().
be
we've had good luck recently with x300 and x61
ron
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:31 AM, ron minnich wrote:
> we've had good luck recently with x300 and x61
>
> ron
>
>
x201 tablet also works.
John
On 29 Apr 2011, at 3:00 pm, erik quanstrom wrote:
Parsing the output of programs which return filenames is the only
common case where I see any complexity from spaces, and then the
complexity only consists of setting and reverting $ifs. Granted that
could be smoother still, especially where you
> I always change it back immediately; a nuisance in for() as it has to
> be set before and re-set inside. I'm considering whether a new shell
> builtin would be desirable, similar to ` but always splitting on
> newlines and only newlines, regardless of $ifs.
this is one thing that byron understo
everything but the wifi works on T61p and X200.
-Skip
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:43 AM, John Floren wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:31 AM, ron minnich wrote:
>> we've had good luck recently with x300 and x61
>>
>> ron
>>
>>
>
> x201 tablet also works.
>
>
> John
>
>
Here's something for a brief respite from linux bashing
In acme, at present a single click positions the cursor, a
double click selects either the word under the cursor or the
entire line, depending on the cursor position.
What I would like to do is to the change logic as follows: If
you doub
It sort of does that now, if you double click to (e.g.) immediately to
the right of { or the left of } it selects the block, multi-line or
not. Is this sufficient for you or did I miss something?
ron
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 9:56 AM, Bakul Shah wrote:
> Here's something for a brief respite from linux bashing
>
> In acme, at present a single click positions the cursor, a
> double click selects either the word under the cursor or the
> entire line, depending on the cursor position.
>
> What I
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:16:17 PDT ron minnich wrote:
> It sort of does that now, if you double click to (e.g.) immediately to
> the right of { or the left of } it selects the block, multi-line or
> not. Is this sufficient for you or did I miss something?
It is not quite what I want. 1) You have t
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 10:28:06 PDT John Floren wrote:
>
> Acme can already do most of those things, except that when you double
> click on the space between two words ("foo bar"). Since you can't
> really click on a character, rather you can only click between two
> characters, it ends up selectin
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 7:19 AM, errno wrote:
> so I'm just speculating.)
>
really? no one has noticed.
On Fri, 29 Apr 2011 11:17 -0400, "erik quanstrom"
wrote:
> > I always change it back immediately; a nuisance in for() as it has to
> > be set before and re-set inside. I'm considering whether a new shell
> > builtin would be desirable, similar to ` but always splitting on
> > newlines and only
Bakul Shah writes:
> Example: given
>
> { fee [({ foo bar}) [and so on]] }
>1 2 3456 7
>
> Double clicking at 1 selects foo,
> at 2 or 3 selects the phrase { foo bar},
> at 4 selects the phrase ({ foo bar}),
> at 5 selects the phrase [({ foo bar}) [and so on]],
> at 6 sele
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:39 PM, wrote:
> Bakul Shah writes:
>
>> Example: given
>>
>> { fee [({ foo bar}) [and so on]] }
>> 1 2 3456 7
>>
>> Double clicking at 1 selects foo,
>> at 2 or 3 selects the phrase { foo bar},
>> at 4 selects the phrase ({ foo bar}),
>> at 5 sele
The T410 mostly works: ethernet, (vesa) video, lower-speed usb.
It has two EHCI controllers and that seems to interfere with
high-speed usb so far.
Haven't tried wifi but I wouldn't expect it to work.
> > this is one thing that byron understood in his version of rc.
> > he had
> > x=``ifs {cmd}
> > the `` was required since `singleton was allowed in his version.
> > i think that one could just extend the grammar to allow
> > x=`ifs {cmd}
> > and i think it would be even better if it were
On Friday, April 29, 2011 05:43:21 AM Ethan Grammatikidis wrote:
> On 27 Apr 2011, at 6:47 pm, Anthony Sorace wrote:
> > • Unification of X11 code and wsys device, by Jesús Galán López [1]
>
> [...]
>
> > [1] http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/proposal/review/google/
> > gsoc2011/yiyus/1
>
> I'm
erik quanstrom writes:
>> within the {} ? I guess that risks breaking any scripts you might want
>> to run as cmd, so yeah, the 3rd looks good.
>
> i implemented the 3d this evening in a compatable way with
> Traditional Rc. there's an argument that it's not completely
Did you include an abilit
> Did you include an ability to split on the null string, to divide the
> data into individual characters/runes?
>
> /me crosses his fingers...
| sed 's/(.)/\1 /g'
I've got a T23 that use to work great. The battery's definitely been a problem
lately, but that's what wall warts are for!
On Apr 29, 2011, at 6:46 PM, ge...@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:
> The T410 mostly works: ethernet, (vesa) video, lower-speed usb.
> It has two EHCI controllers and that seems
On Friday, April 29, 2011 05:21:12 AM Jacob Todd wrote:
> Seeing that plan 9 doesn't have a c++ compiler, i doubt it will ever be
> ported.
>
But APE has c++ (old version of gcc though). I expect that a webkit
(or gecko) port would need to rely on APE, right?
I guess I'd have to start with t
Jeff Sickel writes:
> I've got a T23 that use to work great. The battery's definitely been
> a problem lately, but that's what wall warts are for!
I have a T23, and Plan 9 works OK on it, except that I need to boot with
sdC0dma=1 and can't seem to figure out how to get audio working. The
machi
On Friday, April 29, 2011 09:05:39 PM errno wrote:
> Yep, I'm aware of the vnc workaround... but, it's just the same as
> a native, or near-native approach.
>
I meant: "[...] but, it's just _not_ the same as a native approach."
On Apr 30, 2011, at 12:05 AM, errno wrote:
> But APE has c++ (old version of gcc though).
APE has no c++. there is a very old version of gcc floating around on
sources that can, with some effort, sometimes be made to compile things.
> I expect that a webkit (or gecko) port would need to rely on
43 matches
Mail list logo
