what does vlong double-spill botch mean in
r = (a * b) + (((a * u) + (b * t)) << 18); /* low is only 35b */
a larger section of the code is shown below
t_uint64 a = ABS (s1);
t_uint64 b = ABS (s2);
t_uint64 t, u, r;
if ((a == 0) || (b == 0)) { /* operand = 0
> what does vlong double-spill botch mean in
> r = (a * b) + (((a * u) + (b * t)) << 18); /* low is only 35b */
>
this is a workaround that i put in the compiler;
it's not in the distribution. the distribution
compiler happily miscompiles.
if both the left and rhs side of an expression
hi all
can anyone else confirm that the attached file effectively kills 8c?
it dies on 9vx and virtualbox, will test it on real hardware tomorrow.
cpp -D__STDC__=1 -N -I. -D_PLAN9 -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_BSD_EXTENSION
-D_C99_SNPRINTF_EXTENSION -DVM_PDP10 -IPDP10 -IPDP11
-I/386/include/ape -I/sys/inclu
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 8:11 AM, Fernan Bolando wrote:
> hi all
>
> can anyone else confirm that the attached file effectively kills 8c?
> it dies on 9vx and virtualbox, will test it on real hardware tomorrow.
>
> cpp -D__STDC__=1 -N -I. -D_PLAN9 -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_BSD_EXTENSION
> -D_C99_SNPRINTF_E
On Mon Jan 3 11:12:58 EST 2011, fernanbola...@mailc.net wrote:
> hi all
>
> can anyone else confirm that the attached file effectively kills 8c?
> it dies on 9vx and virtualbox, will test it on real hardware tomorrow.
>
> cpp -D__STDC__=1 -N -I. -D_PLAN9 -D_POSIX_SOURCE -D_BSD_EXTENSION
> -D_C9
On Sun, Jan 2, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Russ Cox wrote:
> Based on information from Anthony Martin, Tony Lainson, and
> Kris Maglione (thanks all!), I have added a -x flag to mklatinkbd,
> so that you can get the same compose sequences in GTK and QT
> programs that you can in Plan 9 programs. Quoting th
this function (here reorganized to avoid the register allocation
problem) was the problem: if *buf were a d10 already, i don't
think you'd have seen this problem.
int32
Map_WriteB (uint32 ba, int32 bc, uint8 *buf)
{
uint32 lim;
a10 pa10;
d10 mask, shift;
lim = ba
