[9fans] MetaPost and troff

2010-11-11 Thread tlaronde
Hello, Since I'm beginning (when I have small slots of time) the integration of MetaPost to kerTeX, I've just discovered that MetaPost could be used not only with TeX, but also with troff. (Well, John Hobby is a member of Bell Labs, so it should not have been a surprise.) Obviously, even if the p

Re: [9fans] p9p factotum available for plan 9

2010-11-11 Thread Noah Evans
You can keep srv() from eating Tattach's and Tauth's without numeric userids with the following: --- a/src/cmd/9pserve.c Wed Nov 03 15:49:22 2010 -0400 +++ b/src/cmd/9pserve.c Thu Nov 11 19:27:02 2010 -0800 @@ -440,6 +440,8 @@ m->tx.uname = getuser();/* what

Re: [9fans] p9p factotum available for plan 9

2010-11-11 Thread erik quanstrom
> You can keep srv() from eating Tattach's and Tauth's without numeric > userids with the following: this patch + factotum + drawterm yields this for me on starting drawterm: console 9pserve: convS2Mu and sizeS2Mu disagree in drawterm mount rpc error - erik

Re: [9fans] p9p factotum available for plan 9

2010-11-11 Thread Noah Evans
Are you using the tip of plan9ports? Noah On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 9:34 PM, erik quanstrom wrote: >> You can keep srv() from eating Tattach's and Tauth's without numeric >> userids with the following: > > this patch + factotum + drawterm yields this for me > on starting drawterm: > > console >

Re: [9fans] p9p factotum available for plan 9

2010-11-11 Thread Noah Evans
Nope, you're right. I got your behavior. There's a race. Noah On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 9:34 PM, erik quanstrom wrote: >> You can keep srv() from eating Tattach's and Tauth's without numeric >> userids with the following: > > this patch + factotum + drawterm yields this for me > on starting draw

Re: [9fans] p9p factotum available for plan 9

2010-11-11 Thread Russ Cox
Does anyone use 9P2000.u anymore? Can we just remove it from the p9p tree? Russ

Re: [9fans] p9p factotum available for plan 9

2010-11-11 Thread Noah Evans
I don't. I say go for it. Noah On Thu, Nov 11, 2010 at 10:19 PM, Russ Cox wrote: > Does anyone use 9P2000.u anymore? > Can we just remove it from the p9p tree? > > Russ > >