> usbfat: finds the first fat fs on each usb disk and mounts
> it in /n/sdU*.
>
> - erik
thanks for explanation. It works now (but I had to recompile the kernel).
R
Hello,
is there any source where I could read about differences between kfs
and fossil (also I heard about something like cwfs), about reasons why
fossil was designed and superceded, when to use which and alike?
Thanks
Ruda
kfs is a simple, non-backed up filesystem designed for stand alone machines
kenfs is the older main file server, it runs stand alone on a single machine
and can use either magnetic disks or WORM disks and provides access to previous
backups online. it supports a narrower range of hardware than the
This might be a stupid question, but I have a regression test that is
returning an unintuitive result from a read(2). The relevant part of the
regression test follows:
char *tst_str = "this is a test... this is only a test.";
ret = fprint(dtf, tst_str);
test(strlen(tst_str)==ret,2,
> test(!strcmp(tst_str,buf)==ret,4, "check value\n");
you haven't explanined what the arguments to test do, but
you appear to be mixing strcmp idioms. i think you wish either
test(strcmp(test_str, buf) == 0, 4, "check value\n");
or
test(!strcmp(test_str, buf), 4, "check valu
thanks for pointers!
R
> is there any source where I could read about differences between kfs
> and fossil (also I heard about something like cwfs), about reasons why
> fossil was designed and superceded, when to use which and alike?
steve's summary is excellent. a few more words about my favorite,
ken's fs
the "worm"
> you haven't explanined what the arguments to test do, but
> you appear to be mixing strcmp idioms. i think you wish either
>
> test(strcmp(test_str, buf) == 0, 4, "check value\n");
>
> or
> test(!strcmp(test_str, buf), 4, "check value\n");
Right. Sorry... The declaration for te
i'm wondering if it has to do with writing/reading the same file (dtf)
without readjusting the offset (i.e. does pread behave differently)?
also about this:
test(!strcmp(tst_str,buf)==ret,4, "check value\n");
do you mean to say
test(strncmp(tst_str,buf,ret) != 0, 4, "check valu
An extended abstract is acceptable.
-Skip
> Is the 8/15 deadline for full papers or just abstracts?
>
> As a note, I fired off an email to the submissions/query email address and
> have not gotten a response...
>
> EBo --
it would help if you posted a complete program.
> i'm wondering if it has to do with writing/reading the same file (dtf)
> without readjusting the offset (i.e. does pread behave differently)?
>
> also about this:
>
> test(!strcmp(tst_str,buf)==ret,4, "check value\n");
>
> do you mean to say
>
> test(strncmp(tst_str,buf,ret) !=
> it would help if you posted a complete program.
I will make a point of doing so in the future, but... This is part of an
automated regression test suite and is separate from the server. Sending
you the complete system would at this point require sending the entire
source-base to compile and
>> it would help if you posted a complete program.
>
> I will make a point of doing so in the future, but... This is part of an
> automated regression test suite and is separate from the server. Sending
> you the complete system would at this point require sending the entire
> source-base to comp
> Turned out to be a read hearing.
ha! :-)
- erik
> No, you shouldn't send the whole code base.
> You should take the time to cut the program down to
> a short demonstration of the problem before posting to
> the list. 9 times out of 10 you find, as was the case
> here, that the problem is not where you thought it was,
> and you avoid the list
16 matches
Mail list logo
