Hi,
can someone tell me why the regular expression /stat[abc]?[ ;\-]/
doesn't match the string "stat-" in acme? I expect it to match, where
does my mistake lie?
Saludos,
--
Hugo
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:26 PM, hugo rivera wrote:
> Hi,
> can someone tell me why the regular expression /stat[abc]?[ ;\-]/
> doesn't match the string "stat-" in acme? I expect it to match, where
> does my mistake lie?
> Saludos,
>
> It's the [abc]? I guess, it says that you want an a, b, or c
2010/7/13 Vinu Rajashekhar :
>
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:26 PM, hugo rivera wrote:
> It's the [abc]? I guess, it says that you want an a, b, or c after stat.
not really, since there's a '?' REP operator there. And it actually
matches strings like "stat;"
--
Hugo
Can you try:
/stat[abc]?[ ;\\-]/
I am not sure (and I do not have acme here), but probably the problem
is with the backslash.
You can try this too:
/stat[abc]?[ ;-]/
Saludos.
On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Vinu Rajashekhar wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 8:26 PM, hugo rivera wrote:
>>
On Tue Jul 13 11:13:03 EDT 2010, uai...@gmail.com wrote:
> Hi,
> can someone tell me why the regular expression /stat[abc]?[ ;\-]/
> doesn't match the string "stat-" in acme? I expect it to match, where
> does my mistake lie?
> Saludos,
if you are doing a b3 search, you want
:/stat[abc]?[
I wasn't searching, but using it with acme's x command.
2010/7/13 erik quanstrom :
> On Tue Jul 13 11:13:03 EDT 2010, uai...@gmail.com wrote:
>> Hi,
>> can someone tell me why the regular expression /stat[abc]?[ ;\-]/
>> doesn't match the string "stat-" in acme? I expect it to match, where
>> does
both of them yield a
regexp: malformed `[]'
error.
I forgot to mention and I had an alternative solution from the
beginning /stat[abc]?([ ;]|-)/
I'm just wondering the reason the original version failed.
2010/7/13 Rodolfo (kix) :
> Can you try:
>
> /stat[abc]?[ ;\\-]/
>
> I am not sure (and I do
> both of them yield a
>
> regexp: malformed `[]'
>
> error.
> I forgot to mention and I had an alternative solution from the
> beginning /stat[abc]?([ ;]|-)/
> I'm just wondering the reason the original version failed.
As I recall, if you're going to include a hyphen in a character
class, it ha
maybe I'm using a buggy version of acme, because /stat[abc]?[- ;]/
also fails with a "malformed" error. And according to the regexp(7)
man page, you should be able to precede a '-' with a backslash.
2010/7/13 :
>> both of them yield a
>>
>> regexp: malformed `[]'
>>
>> error.
>> I forgot to ment
2010/7/13 hugo rivera :
> Hi,
> can someone tell me why the regular expression /stat[abc]?[ ;\-]/
> doesn't match the string "stat-" in acme? I expect it to match, where
> does my mistake lie?
> Saludos,
>
> --
> Hugo
>
>
It works here (both with B3 searches and Edit ,x commands). Maybe what
you h
On 13 Jul 2010, at 16:37, blstu...@bellsouth.net wrote:
both of them yield a
regexp: malformed `[]'
error.
I forgot to mention and I had an alternative solution from the
beginning /stat[abc]?([ ;]|-)/
I'm just wondering the reason the original version failed.
As I recall, if you're going to
> I wasn't searching, but using it with acme's x command.
>
> > if you are doing a b3 search, you want
> >
> > :/stat[abc]?[ ;\-]/
> >
> > just the leading : is missing.
this works for me on a buffer of "stat-\n\n\n\n"
(where \ns are newlines):
Edit ,x/stat[abc]?[ ;\-]/p
> As I r
I think you have found a real bug.
I created a new window containing
x x+ x- xy
and I executed Edit ,x/x[ +\-]/d
and sure enough it doesn't delete x-.
Russ
> I think you have found a real bug.
>
> I created a new window containing
>
>x x+ x- xy
>
> and I executed Edit ,x/x[ +\-]/d
> and sure enough it doesn't delete x-.
Interesting. Is that in p9p acme? I just tried it in 9vx
and it did delete everything except the xy.
BLS
On Tue Jul 13 14:40:02 EDT 2010, r...@swtch.com wrote:
> I think you have found a real bug.
>
> I created a new window containing
>
>x x+ x- xy
>
> and I executed Edit ,x/x[ +\-]/d
> and sure enough it doesn't delete x-.
this really does work for me at coraid, but not at home.
the only diff
the problem is that OPERATOR, and nextrec() now collide
with legit runes.
- erik
patch:
/n/dump/2010/0713/sys/src/cmd/acme/regx.c:20,26 - regx.c:20,26
typedef struct Inst Inst;
struct Inst
{
- uinttype; /* < 0x1 ==> literal, otherwise action */
+ uinttype; /* < 0x100 ==> literal, otherwise action */
union {
int sid;
17 matches
Mail list logo
