> eric, thanks for broadcasting it
yes, thank you eric and everyone involved in organizing and managing
the logistics of the workshop. it was good to be able to listen in.
2009/10/23 W B Hacker :
> We can't 'ave two 9'ers actually *agree* on sumat!
i found it interesting that face to face there seemed to
be much more agreement than disagreement.
very constructive.
i've had a brilliant time.
Back when I still ported software to (instead of from) Plan 9,
I lost many hours to this kind of fiddling with making Plan 9
behave the way configure expects. It's not worth it.
Start porting any piece of software by rm configure* auto*.
Usually a good start is to write a mkfile that lists every
along that line, you might check out steve's
mkmk (contrib/install steve/mkmk). i've only
used it lightly, but it often generates a useful
starting point for turning a chunk of files into
a mkfile.
roger peppe wrote:
2009/10/23 W B Hacker :
We can't 'ave two 9'ers actually *agree* on sumat!
i found it interesting that face to face there seemed to
be much more agreement than disagreement.
very constructive.
i've had a brilliant time.
ACK. Good to hear!
Human nature to get petty, ped
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 1:32 PM, roger peppe wrote:
> 2009/10/23 W B Hacker :
>> We can't 'ave two 9'ers actually *agree* on sumat!
>
> i found it interesting that face to face there seemed to
> be much more agreement than disagreement.
> very constructive.
>
i second that. we could even write cod
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 04:28:20PM -0700, Sam'l B wrote:
> Is anyone working on making them play nice together? Is it possible,
> even?
>
> I get slightly farther with VirtualBox on Vista Home Basic than on
> Fedora 11, but then things come to a complete halt.
>
> Sam'l B.
> (U
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 04:28:20PM -0700, Sam'l B wrote:
> Is anyone working on making them play nice together? Is it possible, even?
On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 04:53:23PM +, Jacob Todd wrote:
> Plan 9 works fine in qemu on both windows (xp at least) and linux.
I found 9vx works well so far.
S
