On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 3:04 AM, Akshat Kumar
wrote:
> Although there is already an ircfs for Inferno, since I don't want to
> run Inferno outside of Plan 9
Why not?
> and certainly not over a remote connection to Plan 9
Why not?
> (these
> also being my only options -- unless someone wants to
>I don't want to
> run Inferno
> outside of Plan 9, and certainly not over a remote connection to Plan 9 (these
> also being my only options -- unless someone wants to start creating drivers
> for
> Atheros wireless cards)
Couldn't you run Inferno inside of plan9?
>
> I seem to remember Mjl, the author if the inferno ircfs, wrote an
> ircfs for Plan 9 ages ago. Still, seems like a total waste of time
> when you have a perfectly fine one in limbo, which is a much more
> convenient language for building such a thing anyway.
>
the op said he was running plan
>>
>> I seem to remember Mjl, the author if the inferno ircfs, wrote an
>> ircfs for Plan 9 ages ago. Still, seems like a total waste of time
>> when you have a perfectly fine one in limbo, which is a much more
>> convenient language for building such a thing anyway.
>>
[snip]
> so, since an irc
Hi !
Much of them i've read !!! ;)
2009/1/16 Rodolfo kix Garcia
> Hi!
>
> I found these articles about scifi. Are the top tep books of scifi (NY
> Times) and the 20 Ten geek books.
>
>
> http://www.papelenblanco.com/2009/01/14-los-10-mejores-libros-de-ciencia-ficcion-segun-el-times
> http://www
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 3:28 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
>>
>> I seem to remember Mjl, the author if the inferno ircfs, wrote an
>> ircfs for Plan 9 ages ago. Still, seems like a total waste of time
>> when you have a perfectly fine one in limbo, which is a much more
>> convenient language for build
Or have a native Limbo compiler; I've been itching for that for some time,
but I've much else on my hands. One day when free...
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 9:28 AM, erik quanstrom wrote:
> >
> > I seem to remember Mjl, the author if the inferno ircfs, wrote an
> > ircfs for Plan 9 ages ago. Still, s
1)
Is someone currently working on or has some stuff prepared for EHCI
support for plan9?
2)
I found that usbd has sometimes problems with replugging a usb
device. After killing usbd and restrating it anything works fine. But
this has the disadvantage that I loose other previously started usb
dri
We are working on a new usb set of drivers, with hot plugging.
usbd is now able to fire up drivers if necessary.
Ehci will come later.
But don´t hold your breath.
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 4:33 AM, wrote:
> 1)
> Is someone currently working on or has some stuff prepared for EHCI
> support for pla
Hello all -
I recently added a USB 2.0 PCMCIA card to the array of crutches my old
laptop uses ... and have found that when I attempt to log on to my Plan 9
install, booting hangs with the following line
#U/usb0: uhci: port 0xBF80 irq 11
... if I leave the card (and by association what is p
>Or have a native Limbo compiler; I've been itching for that for some time,
it doesn't mean anything.
Uh, considering that ircfs is for Inferno (via Limbo), having a Limbo
compiler to native Plan9 would be a potential solution, assuming the run
time could be kept the same.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Charles Forsyth wrote:
> >Or have a native Limbo compiler; I've been itching for that for so
> > >Or have a native Limbo compiler; I've been itching for that for some time,
> >
> > it doesn't mean anything.
>
> Uh, considering that ircfs is for Inferno (via Limbo), having a Limbo
> compiler to native Plan9 would be a potential solution, assuming the run
> time could be kept the same.
de t
Well, actually, I was thinking of something along the lines of Lisaac:
"dynamic" modules are statically compiled ala object files, & the run time
handles issues between Plan9 & Inferno. Sys->load & the like would not be
dynamic, but would work as expected. Hell, it could even just be a
.Net/perl2ex
> Well, actually, I was thinking of something along the lines of Lisaac:
> "dynamic" modules are statically compiled ala object files, & the run time
> handles issues between Plan9 & Inferno. Sys->load & the like would not be
> dynamic, but would work as expected. Hell, it could even just be a
> .N
Inline
On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 6:52 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
> > Well, actually, I was thinking of something along the lines of Lisaac:
> > "dynamic" modules are statically compiled ala object files, & the run
> time
> > handles issues between Plan9 & Inferno. Sys->load & the like would not be
>
>Although there is already an ircfs for Inferno, since I don't want to run
>Inferno
>outside of Plan 9, and certainly not over a remote connection to Plan 9 (these
>also being my only options -- unless someone wants to start creating drivers
>for
>Atheros wireless cards), I've begun work on an FS
17 matches
Mail list logo
