On Dec 20, 3:46 pm, quans...@quanstro.net (erik quanstrom) wrote:
> On Sat Dec 20 01:33:12 EST 2008, n...@cs.jhu.edu wrote:
>
> > Have people seenhttp://wiki.ubnt.com/wiki/index.php/RouterStation? Any
> > idea on what porting the kernel to this guy would be like?
>
> keine ahnung.
>
> i didn't see
>tested so far, drawterm, 9vx are all so slow in updating inferno screen (i
i tried running inferno in an 1152x900 x8r8g8b8 within 9vx. (the window is
controlled by rio in 9vx but even then emu's draw operations go direct to the
9vx kernel
via draw.) this is on a 1.2Ghz core duo on ubuntu 8.04.
> But if you can tell parallels to use a different network
> "card" it's worth a try.
I don't think you can. It's RTL8029 (=ne2k) or nothing.
2008/12/23 erik quanstrom :
> first from il
> ; time cat gs>/dev/null
> 0.00u 0.00s 9.70rcat gs
>
> next via tcp
> ; time cat /386/bin/gs>/dev/null
> 0.00u 0.00s 40.27r cat /386/bin/gs
I wonder if this is because of the timer in 9vx being less granular
and causing the TCP timer proce
> 2008/12/23 erik quanstrom :
> > first from il
> > ; time cat gs>/dev/null
> > 0.00u 0.00s 9.70rcat gs
> >
> > next via tcp
> > ; time cat /386/bin/gs>/dev/null
> > 0.00u 0.00s 40.27r cat /386/bin/gs
>
> I wonder if this is because of the timer in 9vx being less granular
> and causi
> 2008/12/23 erik quanstrom :
> > first from il
> > ; time cat gs>/dev/null
> > 0.00u 0.00s 9.70rcat gs
> >
> > next via tcp
> > ; time cat /386/bin/gs>/dev/null
> > 0.00u 0.00s 40.27r cat /386/bin/gs
>
> I wonder if this is because of the timer in 9vx being less granular
> and causi
Hey guys,
This was in my gmail ads this morning:
http://www.glomationinc.com/
SBC ARM, 200MHz w/MMU, 32MB RAM, 128MB flash, Ethernet, Watchdog, RTC.
Optional WiFi module over USB. $49 -- but that says `quantity' price.
I don't know what it is at low quantity. I'll email. (Ok, I got the
email. At
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:32 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
> first from il
> ; time cat gs>/dev/null
> 0.00u 0.00s 9.70rcat gs
>
> next via tcp
> ; time cat /386/bin/gs>/dev/null
> 0.00u 0.00s 40.27r cat /386/bin/gs
what about the host tcp?
Is there any equivalent of sendfd() on native Plan 9?
Thanks.
--nwf;
pgpCxPRdGX3TE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
> On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 9:32 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
>> first from il
>> ; time cat gs>/dev/null
>> 0.00u 0.00s 9.70rcat gs
>>
>> next via tcp
>> ; time cat /386/bin/gs>/dev/null
>> 0.00u 0.00s 40.27r cat /386/bin/gs
>
> what about the host tcp?
ftp is the easiest test i have.
That differs from my experience - I usually run 3 columns on a 30"
monitor, with tags open to two lines for most of my active windows;
the second line typically has an Edit command lying around because you
can't effectively 2-1 chord Edits. The extra length is also useful
for dealing with
> (Really, it was easier to fix the editor than to get the rest of the
> team to move to a saner tree structure, aggravated by cross-platform/
> cross-compile/cross-toolchain requirements that cause a 3 way cross
> product of both build and some sources. If only the world had been
> sold on
> the obscenely deep tree our development happens in
I sympathise, though ours is not _that_ bad. I use Plan9 as my
desktop and mount parts of our server off a "work" dir in my home
directory. This way I can work with short paths whilst remaining
compatible with my colleagues.
just my 2¢
-Steve
The P9P version has this too: acme -$
But that still doesn't address ease of Edit commands or tags full of
build config strings and other crap. Yes, I've been relying more on
tags than guide files of late.
Paul
On 23-Dec-08, at 10:54 AM, erik quanstrom wrote:
(Really, it was easier to
> btw, what was your plan9.ini config? did it look like:
>
> vgasize=1280x800
> monitor=macbook (or xga?, sorry i am not sure about this)
Before changing vgadb, I had success with:
vgasize=1280x768x24
monitor=cinema
> and, since we are in VM, does the native resolution really ma
> http://www.glomationinc.com/
i have adopted the 'technologic ts-7200':
http://www.embeddedarm.com/products/board-detail.php?product=TS-7200
it runs netbsd, i have not started any plan9 work
nkl
i have a slightly unrelated question: what do you get if you use 'fcp'
instead of 'cp' for the same file over tcp and il?
thanks
Nathaniel,
I am not 100% sure if my answer will solve your problem, but probably
you can do it using the 9P protocol.
Look http://plan9.bell-labs.com/magic/man2html/5/0intro, 9P is the way
to comunicate the kernel with the proccess. Probably sendfd is not
needed in Plan 9.
Saludos.
Nathan
You can post a fd at /srv for others to use
On 12/23/08, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
> Nathaniel,
>
> I am not 100% sure if my answer will solve your problem, but probably
> you can do it using the 9P protocol.
>
> Look http://plan9.bell-labs.com/magic/man2html/5/0intro, 9P is the way
> to comunica
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 1:27 PM, Nick LaForge wrote:
>> http://www.glomationinc.com/
>
> i have adopted the 'technologic ts-7200':
>
> http://www.embeddedarm.com/products/board-detail.php?product=TS-7200
>
> it runs netbsd, i have not started any plan9 work
>
ah. I should locate my half-assed pla
On Wed, Dec 24, 2008 at 12:53:06AM +0100, Francisco J Ballesteros wrote:
> You can post a fd at /srv for others to use
/srv is not an ideal answer, though it is the one I feared would be given.
/srv allows any process running as a given user to access the posted fd, and
does not respect namespace
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:52:51PM +0100, Rodolfo kix Garcia wrote:
> Nathaniel,
>
> I am not 100% sure if my answer will solve your problem, but probably
> you can do it using the 9P protocol.
>
> Look http://plan9.bell-labs.com/magic/man2html/5/0intro, 9P is the way
> to comunicate the kernel
> /srv is not an ideal answer, though it is the one I feared would be given.
> /srv allows any process running as a given user to access the posted fd, and
> does not respect namespace or process group boundaries. I want a mechanism
> to pass a file descriptor to one target process so that I can p
> i have a slightly unrelated question: what do you get if you use 'fcp'
> instead of 'cp' for the same file over tcp and il?
>
> thanks
great question. unfortunately a power problem has reconfigured
my network for me and i can't generate comparable numbers just
yet.
- erik
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 08:39:27PM -0500, erik quanstrom wrote:
> > /srv is not an ideal answer, though it is the one I feared would be given.
> > /srv allows any process running as a given user to access the posted fd, and
> > does not respect namespace or process group boundaries. I want a mecha
> All of the same comments apply to /srv (though srv^2 is trying to solve
> this).
not true. import $server / /n/$server will give you access to srv on $server
as /n/$server/srv.
what is "srv^2"?
> 1) Sending files across namespaces so that I can spawn acme at rio startup
> and plumb to it with
On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 11:14:16PM -0500, erik quanstrom wrote:
> > All of the same comments apply to /srv (though srv^2 is trying to solve
> > this).
>
> not true. import $server / /n/$server will give you access to srv on $server
> as /n/$server/srv.
Fair, but there's no reason to propose that
27 matches
Mail list logo
