That's nearly as many cores as I have gates! Very good indeed - just
don't say "Hooter's Girls" to Mr Van Hensbergen.
brucee
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 3:53 AM, ron minnich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just booted Plan 9 on a 1024+16 node BG/P this week. .
>
> All credit to jmk, ericvh, and charles f
That's great.
Any plan to run it for end users?
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 9:07 AM, Bruce Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's nearly as many cores as I have gates! Very good indeed - just
> don't say "Hooter's Girls" to Mr Van Hensbergen.
>
> brucee
>
> On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 3:53 AM, ron minni
Wow what a lively thread. Lots of good information (thanks Ron, Rob et
al) and behavioural commentary (thanks Skip) but it seems to be of no
avail.
As I'm the only one awake in Volos at 10:30am and I have 40 cafes with
WiFi to myself I'll waste bandwidth and tell a little story with no
stated conc
>Any plan to run it for end users?
"Sole purpose of visit"
as someone supposedly quipped in answer to the question on the US entry form:
"Is it your intention to overthrow the government of the United States?"
(that response is variously attributed, although both Evelyn Waugh and Gilbert
Harding
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 05:53:25PM -0800, ron minnich wrote:
> Just booted Plan 9 on a 1024+16 node BG/P this week. .
>
> All credit to jmk, ericvh, and charles for this fantastic test run and
> the existence of this new kernel.
Just chiming in to say very nicely done, congratulations, && thanks f
Hi, I am trying to add a user. I run "Con -l /srv/fscons" at the
prompt I add a user using uname. I add the user to sys, and then
login with my new user I do run /sys/lib/newuser also. I try to run
acme though and it says: "Cant create temp file: blah blah blah
permission denied" How can I chang
I put the photos in my contrib on sources yesterday.
The http file listing on sources seems broken currently...
so here are the urls:
http://plan9.bell-labs.com/sources/contrib/cinap_lenrek/photos/iwp9.2008/dscn0181.jpg
http://plan9.bell-labs.com/sources/contrib/cinap_lenrek/photos/iwp9.2008/ds
> So how many cores is that for each member of the
> Plan 9 community? :-) On a slightly more serious
> note, would it be terribly naive to guess that
> there would be more cores running Plan 9 in that
> machine than there are throughout the rest of the
> world?
not yet. coraid is responsible f
> Hi, I am trying to add a user. I run "Con -l /srv/fscons" at the
> prompt I add a user using uname. I add the user to sys, and then
> login with my new user I do run /sys/lib/newuser also. I try to run
> acme though and it says: "Cant create temp file: blah blah blah
> permission denied" How c
>> Is this phenomenon specific to me?
>
> No, it isn't:
>
> term% ps|grep Broken
> none9172:08 42:50 264K Broken smtpd
impressive!
i don't see this problem, but i have implemented
some fairly agressive spam control. perhaps this
shows up after i tend to hang up.
(it is
> Is this phenomenon specific to me?
No, it isn't:
term% ps|grep Broken
none9172:08 42:50 264K Broken smtpd
> Cant create temp file: blah blah blah
> permission denied
sounds like you have no $home/tmp, but /sys/lib/newuser will
have created one for you so it doesn't make sense.
check if $home/tmp exists and is writable by you.
-Steve
Thanks for the help guys, everything works now.
I got this one yesterday: http://www.discogs.com/release/1477544
It's well done. I didn't find anyone who had stuff from Kerberos though.
Sorry for digging this out once more. Perhaps a russsian will
appreciate this some day:)
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 11:49 AM, hiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On W
Hello,
A while back I created a user by the normal procedure of adding it to
the FS and running auth/changeuser, then logging in as the user and
running /sys/lib/newuser. However, it turns out that all the files
created for the user had awkward permissions on them -- specifically,
the group and us
> d-rwxr-xr-x M 2225 (user) (user) 0 Oct 28 13:15 /cron/user
> (notice theparentheses)
the klammeraffen mean that the user has been removed
from the users' table in the fs. you'll need to add the user
back to proceede.
- erik
On Thu, 2008-11-06 at 06:54 -0500, erik quanstrom wrote:
> > So how many cores is that for each member of the
> > Plan 9 community? :-) On a slightly more serious
> > note, would it be terribly naive to guess that
> > there would be more cores running Plan 9 in that
> > machine than there are thr
>> not yet. coraid is responsible for ~4k cores
>> running plan 9 right now. of course the maximum
>> concentration in one place is jus a few hundred.
>
> Were does this show up in their product line?
sr appliances.
- erik
Erik,
Taking your advice, I tried connecting to fscons and running:
uname user user
however, the fs reports:
uname: uname 'user' already exists
is this what you meant to try in your previous post, or have I
misunderstood?
Thanks
congrats!
--
Federico G. Benavento
On Thu Nov 6 15:49:03 EST 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Erik,
>
> Taking your advice, I tried connecting to fscons and running:
> uname user user
> however, the fs reports:
> uname: uname 'user' already exists
> is this what you meant to try in your previous post, or have I
> misunderstood
Thank you for taking the time to run such a trial test.
What do you think would be the best course of action following
fsys main open -A ?
Delete all files owned by user and remove user from the FS user table?
Then perhaps recreate the user?
Or instead, just look around for what might be "amiss"
You can delete arbitary files using the fossil console
commands clri to delete the files first, tne directories,
and then flchk to reclaim the storage, see fossilcons(8).
Having said this I would perservere with trying to restore
the username as Erik describes. check the contents of /adm/users
whi
Ah,
So, upon the suggestions of Erik and Steve, I took up the task of just
trying to regain this user's dignity (permissions, recognition). As
hostowner, I copied /adm/users to a personal DIR, removed the line for
that user, then went into fscons, and ran
users -r /path/to/copied/adm/users
un
On Nov 6, 2008, at 3:01 AM, Kernel Panic wrote:
http://plan9.bell-labs.com/sources/contrib/cinap_lenrek/photos/iwp9.2008/dscn0213.jpg
This one is truly awesome!
Thanks,
Roman.
On Nov 5, 2008, at 9:40 PM, Nathaniel W Filardo wrote:
Would this suffice?
It sounds like exactly the kind of thing I was talking about.
Did I miss something obvious?
And this would be a million dollar question here. I don't
think you did (although Eric constantly warns us of
dragons), but
On Nov 5, 2008, at 4:55 AM, erik quanstrom wrote:
I'm asking is -- "dear kernel, please don't advance this process
even
if you otherwise can". All I need is a frozen state so that I can
not so easy on a multiprocessor. (unless you turn all but one
processor off.)
Hm. May be its getting lat
On Nov 4, 2008, at 4:34 AM, erik quanstrom wrote:
So the question remains -- what is the proper way of putting a
process
that waits for an IO into a Stopped state?
i don't think it's possible without changing the kernel.
but it's a good question, why does it work this way?
obviously one doesn
On Thu, Nov 06, 2008 at 09:18:47PM -0800, Roman Shaposhnik wrote:
> On Nov 5, 2008, at 9:40 PM, Nathaniel W Filardo wrote:
>> Would this suffice?
>
> It sounds like exactly the kind of thing I was talking about.
OK. To reiterate what I said earlier, these kinds of "soonstop"-ed
processes may stil
29 matches
Mail list logo
