On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 4:41 PM, Sergey Zhilkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ohh, those Russians :)
>
> 2008/10/20 Sevan / Venture37 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> > has anyone looked into this?
>> >
>> > i found this by a group in Spain, though not what i expected ☺
>> >
>> > Kerberos (7) - Plan 9 From
two young 9fans were staying in a small, but comfortable, room at the
Hotel ΑΔΜΗΤΟΣ - and as a parting gesture we tried an experiment - how
many 9fans can you fit in a small hotel room in Βόλος?
well the experiment had to be changed when the dude at the front desk
got nervous.
how many 9fans can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 2, 2008, at 1:51 PM, Skip Tavakkolian wrote:
[blank message]
The strangest part? It's been down since this morning (I'm on Murray
Hill time here on Long Island); longer than usual.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darw
Sources is back up. We had a power outage and some of our machines
didn't come back up automatically, though they usually do.
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 15:35, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sources is back up. We had a power outage and some of our machines
> didn't come back up automatically, though they usually do.
and here i was thinking you had taken them offline to retool them for
standard time ☺. thank you for maintain
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Nov 2, 2008, at 4:58 PM, michael block wrote:
retool them for standard time
isn't that done automatically?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkkOO7wACgkQuv7AVNQDs+yHxgCgqfsq+xr9i710y0c0Wogr7OIT
JpEAoKIGJAe
* Roman Shaposhnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
> >Besides the fact that I'm not making binary packages at all,
> >splitted / small sources make packaging a lot easier.
>
> So let me get this straight: you're trying to solve a problem
> that you don't have, right?
No, I got a problem to be s
* Roman V. Shaposhnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 17:29 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > Convenience is one point (sometimes be a big point), but another
> > important one is sharing. Without mmap(), an (real) shared library
> > support most likely will require special kernel
> * Roman V. Shaposhnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 17:29 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > > Convenience is one point (sometimes be a big point), but another
> > > important one is sharing. Without mmap(), an (real) shared library
> > > support most likely will require spec
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 5:50 PM, erik quanstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> * Roman V. Shaposhnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 17:29 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>> > > Convenience is one point (sometimes be a big point), but another
>> > > important one is sharing. Withou
On Nov 1, 2008, at 7:12 PM, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
On Sat, Nov 1, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Roman Shaposhnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 1, 2008, at 8:04 AM, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
I would imagine that 99% of the time (more?) the behavior people
desire would be what you describe.
But wh
* erik quanstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Roman V. Shaposhnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 17:29 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > > > Convenience is one point (sometimes be a big point), but another
> > > > important one is sharing. Without mmap(), an (real) shared
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 8:18 PM, Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But now I'm curious how executables and shared libraries are
> actually handled on plan9.
>
what's a shared library?
Executables:
/sys/src/9/
Check it out, it's short and sweet.
ron
Guys,
I've been experimenting with how Plan 9 handles notes for processes and
I must confess that I'm now confused and in need your help.
First of all, the proc(3) man page says that "A read [from /proc/n/
note] of at least ERRLEN
characters will retrieve the oldest note posted to the process a
>> how many 9fans can you fit in a small hotel room in Βόλος before the
management get upset?
If the first 9fan is Boyd packing his normal weaponry, I would imagine
the answer is at most one. Ditto for a large hotel room anywhere in
the world.
Guys,
when somebody tries to stop a process that is waiting for the IO the
process
doesn't get transferred to a Stopped state immediately but only when
the scheduler sees it for the first time. This leads to a process
writing to
a /proc/n/ctl being put in a Stopwait state which is a bit inc
>> But now I'm curious how executables and shared libraries are
>> actually handled on plan9.
>>
>what's a shared library?
even if plan 9 were to have them, and i were doing it, i don't think i'd
implement them using mmap and trampolines.
>I still remember this science fiction movie from when I was a kid.
which one was that? it sounds more interesting than mmap.
On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 11:29 PM, Charles Forsyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>I still remember this science fiction movie from when I was a kid.
>
> which one was that? it sounds more interesting than mmap.
>
>
I wish I could remember. It had the usual guys in silvery suits. They
walk through a fr
This courtesy of the ACPI spec: ""RSD PTR " (Notice that this
signature must contain a trailing
blank character.)"
So where do we get the guys who design this stuff? Can we send them
back? Or put them in an infinite loop in a time machine (oh wait see
the subject).
ron
well the experiment description should include "- each with a
significantly large backpack-".
2008/11/3 Andrew Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>>> how many 9fans can you fit in a small hotel room in Βόλος before the
> management get upset?
>
> If the first 9fan is Boyd packing his normal weaponry, I
Is it worth adding that in Inferno all libraries are shared as is all
of memory - seamlessly and safely? Always has been - always will be.
And there is no bloody mmap() in sight.
Also I believe that every bad science fiction movie is analogous to a
computer science moral play. And the more the mo
23 matches
Mail list logo
