Re: [9fans] notes and traps

2008-08-30 Thread Steve Simon
purely as an aside this detailed conversation on how notes are handled in the kernel is very interesting, I was trying to understand this myself recently and gave up; I will now try again. Thanks, -Steve

Re: [9fans] notes and traps

2008-08-30 Thread erik quanstrom
> I'm not claiming anyone to be wrong. I want to solve > this problem. i'm not sure there is a problem with notes. but i really can't answer that question. someone with a better understanding of what notes are supposed to be could answer this. > I also noted that i think this is the correct beh

Re: [9fans] notes and traps

2008-08-30 Thread cinap_lenrek
> > I'm not claiming anyone to be wrong. I want to solve > > this problem. > > i'm not sure there is a problem with notes. but i really can't > answer that question. someone with a better understanding > of what notes are supposed to be could answer this. > > > I also noted that i think this is

Re: [9fans] notes and traps

2008-08-30 Thread cinap_lenrek
> i'm not convinced that you've explained why this change is > correct or why it could solve the problem. after all, the > NNOTED array is only 5 entries long. what if one gets 5 > user notes before the system note? > do you kill the process (isn't this how it works now?), > make notes unreliable