[EMAIL PROTECTED] (sqweek) writes:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:06 PM, Paul Donnelly
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The bear is indentation, since to make it work out it's
>> necessary to use a fixed-width font (something I'd rather not do) and
>> adjust it by hand, which needs to happen more ofte
Now if only we others would stop sending any more mails...
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 9:13 AM, Andrew Simmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Anyway, you won't get any more of this. End of transmission. ␄
>>
> Hurrah!
>
> sys=monty
> dom=monty.localdomain
> ip=192.168.0.5 ip=fd32:6e43:fb94::5 ether=000c29144b0a
you wish ipv6. see ndb(6). i don't know if you
eliminated the original dom= for the post, but
it's worth noting that dom is supposed to be the
dns fqdn of the host. if you just want a pl
Hi,
After pulling today, /386/bin/topng is broken. It's much smaller than
it used to be, and it generates empty files, whereas the topng from
20080821 doesn't. "cmp /386/bin/topng
/n/sourcesdump/2008/0821/plan9/386/bin/topng" tells me that they are
the same until EOF on /386/bin/topng, so it seems
In the recent NeXT thread Eric mentioned the TI Beagle Board
(http://beagleboard.org/). It's quite neat: $150 for a 3" x 3" PCB
w/ a 600 MHz ARM core, HD capable video, and SD card, audio, serial,
USB and DVI ports. The documentation seems fairly complete, although
according the mailing list the
this is what brucee said a while back about an ARM Cortex-M3
based device:
> I found the data sheet for the
> Cortex chip if someone needs it. A bit of a challenge for an arm port
> but it's fun indeed.
the "fun" refers to this device:
http://www.stm32circle.com
> In the recent NeXT thread Eric
Is this not the basis of http://openpandora.org 's devices?
Pretty cool.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:10 PM, John Barham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the recent NeXT thread Eric mentioned the TI Beagle Board
> (http://beagleboard.org/). It's quite neat: $150 for a 3" x 3" PCB
> w/ a 600 MHz ARM
I've just discussed this with Charles. Vita has a thumb compiler (tc)
which works with 5l.
The Cortex-M3 is thumb-2 only so these two aren't quite sufficient,
but a flag will help.
brucee
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 6:42 AM, Skip Tavakkolian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> this is what brucee said a wh
yeah thanks
--
http://www.fernski.com
I'd like to see Plan 9 being run on a portable device, and up until
now I thought the only ways were to get an iPAQ (but are newer models
compatible?) or to port 9vx to the iPhone (but does Apple's license
allow that?). Can we use this board to make an alternative - the new
bitsy? This seem
buy one, play with it.
brucee
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 2:14 PM, Pietro Gagliardi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to see Plan 9 being run on a portable device, and up until now I
> thought the only ways were to get an iPAQ (but are newer models compatible?)
> or to port 9vx to the iPhone (but
> iPAQ
> iPhone
nintendo ds looks like the biggest bang for the buck. somebody on
the inferno list showed it running inferno. there are emulators for it
too.
I have a few boards from luminary. They are good and cheap. $69 fits
into the toy budget.
brucee
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Skip Tavakkolian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> iPAQ
>> iPhone
>
> nintendo ds looks like the biggest bang for the buck. somebody on
> the inferno list showed it runni
oh yeah, hobby land. lea and tiger do most of the work.
http://groups.google.com/group/casella
brucee
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 3:38 PM, Bruce Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a few boards from luminary. They are good and cheap. $69 fits
> into the toy budget.
>
> brucee
> Is this not the basis of http://openpandora.org 's devices?
The core chips seem to be the same, but otherwise they're separate
projects AFAIK.
Back in the PC world, a motherboard w/ Intel's Atom chip can be had
for $80: http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16813121342.
Amazing h
I'll back off filling the list. Contact me off-list if you wanna know
my experience with these devices.
Sorry Charles if I breached confidentiality - but that was pretty
accurate I think.
brucee
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 4:03 PM, John Barham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is this not the basis of h
16 matches
Mail list logo
