Roman V. Shaposhnik writes:
> If we were to oversimplify things [then the] brain
>is, at its core, limited by a very fundamental biological constraint:
>speed at which cells can communicate. A sort of "propagation delay"
>if we were to use electronics as an analogy. It seems to be agr
Either that or (like some brain scientists say) something is
really, really wrong or suboptimal about the human brain.
Despite prospects of brain uptime--that's LE--being around 77.71 years for
each individual of the USAmerican population and the "entire history" of
computers being shorter tha
The hg web interface can automatically provide tarballs of the latest
tip, simply add: allow_archive = bz2 zip to your
hgweb.config (there is a way to do this per-project, but I don't remember how).
For an example of how it works see http://repo.cat-v.org/hg/
uriel
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 4:50 AM
Ran into an interesting one setting up my cpu server. The following
reliably freezes the box:
# echo dma on >/dev/sdC0/ctl
# 9fat:
Leaves the console totally unresponsive, no ^T^Tp, no ^P. rc -x on
9fat: gives "rfork e" as the final command.
sdC0 is a cdrom. I can turn dma on for my sata disks
I wonder why there is a command to turn on DMA on disks. Could
it be that some disks don't work with DMA on?
Sape
--- Begin Message ---
Ran into an interesting one setting up my cpu server. The following
reliably freezes the box:
# echo dma on >/dev/sdC0/ctl
# 9fat:
Leaves the console
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Sape Mullender
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder why there is a command to turn on DMA on disks. Could
> it be that some disks don't work with DMA on?
sure. it's PC hardware, so it's crap :-)
ron
Hello. Is there an alternative to the macros in this header? My
program uses some of them (DBL_MIN, DBL_MAX, DBL_EPSILON), and
including yields name clashes. Thanks.
Hi
did anyone know if this controller is supported by the sata driver?
i cant see anywhere in sdata.c and sdiahci.c. . . i guess it isnt supported at
all, so there is no option to fill some "silly" pci-id somewhere to get it
going.
The new 9grid.es server has this controller, it would be a p
> > I wonder why there is a command to turn on DMA on disks. Could
> > it be that some disks don't work with DMA on?
> sure. it's PC hardware, so it's crap :-)
unfortunately, this isn't a pc hardware thing. pata
devices are not required to support dma. ata 7, which
is the first to include sata
> i cant see anywhere in sdata.c and sdiahci.c. . . i guess it isnt supported
> at all, so there is no option to fill some "silly" pci-id somewhere to get it
> going.
try http://www.quanstro.net/sdiahci.c.
i hadn't enabled this in the release version because i didn't
have any hardware on which
the threaded view is pretty useful but a good
bit of the time, i skim the list archives in order.
is there any way to get the old, unthreaded view?
- erik
Ah, the old format was very nice, but to have threading at last is
very nice too, but I agree having both would be best. Is the code used
to generate the 9fans.net web archives somewhere? The output is much
better than any other mailing list web archive I have seen.
uriel
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 1
> the threaded view is pretty useful but a good
> bit of the time, i skim the list archives in order.
> is there any way to get the old, unthreaded view?
Sequential messages with the same
subject get grouped so that the subject
is given only once, but there is no
reordering of messages.
Now that
> Sequential messages with the same
> subject get grouped so that the subject
> is given only once, but there is no
> reordering of messages.
>
> Now that you know that, do you still want
> the old, unthreaded view? I can't see that
> it has any advantage over the current one.
okay. that makes
> > OK, am I just out of date or is there a real reason for linker
> > sets?
>
> I see it this way:
>
> using linker sets means you have to learn and understand the linkers
> language
> to understand how the system is configured (when trying to track down a
> problem)
>
> usi
> Hello. Is there an alternative to the macros in this header? My
> program uses some of them (DBL_MIN, DBL_MAX, DBL_EPSILON), and
> including yields name clashes. Thanks.
Why not change your program not to use
standard names for its own purposes?
Russ
On Aug 5, 2008, at 7:43 PM, Russ Cox wrote:
Hello. Is there an alternative to the macros in this header? My
program uses some of them (DBL_MIN, DBL_MAX, DBL_EPSILON), and
including yields name clashes. Thanks.
Why not change your program not to use
standard names for its own purposes?
Russ
I'm so confused. Why don't you just show the code.
ron
On Aug 5, 2008, at 11:14 PM, ron minnich wrote:
I'm so confused. Why don't you just show the code.
ron
#include
...
#include
...
static struct{
char *name;
double value;
}constants[] = {
...
"MIN",DBL_MIN,
"MAX",DBL_M
19 matches
Mail list logo
