Re: [9fans] 9vx dns funny

2008-07-10 Thread Nathaniel W Filardo
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 01:17:53PM -0400, Russ Cox wrote: > > i guess this gets to a more philosophical question > > on how 9vx networking relates to the host. > > > > personally, i feel it would be more useful to be > > able to use plan 9's native network stack. but > > i'm biased. i want to se

[9fans] Can't install Plan9 on VMWare

2008-07-10 Thread Philip Silva
Hi! I've downloaded the Plan9 iso from http://plan9.bell-labs.com/plan9/download.html and tried to test the live cd. It wasn't really possible, at first the boot manager won't really react (the trick seems to wait a long time...) and then some error appears. But since I decided to install it on VM

[9fans] vx32 @ FreeBSD: -Ilibvxc/include missing?

2008-07-10 Thread Nikolai Saoukh
$ uname -a FreeBSD NetFaker 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #13: Wed Jul 2 15:04:57 MSD 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NETFAKER i386 $ gmake gmake: vx32-gcc: Command not found gmake: vx32-gcc: Command not found gcc -c -o vxa/vorbis/libvorbis/lib/analysis.ho -Ivxa/vorbis -Ivxa/vorbi

Re: [9fans] 9vx dns funny

2008-07-10 Thread maht
Nathaniel W Filardo wrote: Just a reminder, nothing novel: if you don't mind being root on the host briefly (to run ifconfig, brctl, and tunctl commands), you can create a new TAP interface (and use the file descriptor in 9vx to back a devether) and use Linux's bridging to get ethernet frames to

Re: [9fans] Can't install Plan9 on VMWare

2008-07-10 Thread erik quanstrom
> I also made a test doubling each partition's size (exept for nvram) and I > ended up with some error that told me IIRC that for my large disc FAT16 > doesn't work out, so I would have to use FAT32. Trying to increment each > partition lowly (starting from the default size) doesn't help either - >

Re: [9fans] why not Lvx for Plan 9?

2008-07-10 Thread matt
Skip Tavakkolian wrote: vxlinux under plan9 will be useful, but only to us 9fans. Isn't that good enough reason? Russ Cox Linux vx for Plan 9 would help people who prefer to use Linux but must use Plan 9. I am sure such people exist, but I feel no sympathy toward them. ;-) I don't as

Re: [9fans] why not Lvx for Plan 9?

2008-07-10 Thread Russ Cox
> I don't ask for sympathy but having a Linux that ran on Plan 9 would be > a useful tool. I need to have Gimp knocking about or an IMAP client for > Gbs of mail. If linuxemu can run Opera, I would imagine you can use it to run Gimp too, with some work. If you want an imap client, you could com

Re: [9fans] why not Lvx for Plan 9?

2008-07-10 Thread erik quanstrom
> ... or an IMAP client for Gbs of mail. not for much longer. there is a testing version of upas + imap4d on sources (/n/sources/contrib/quanstro/nupas) that might work for you. i have not changed the upas/fs interface so older versions of ned, Mail and imap4d continue to work, but i have includ

Re: [9fans] why not Lvx for Plan 9?

2008-07-10 Thread erik quanstrom
> upas + imap4d on sources (/n/sources/contrib/quanstro/nupas) wrong path. /n/sources/contrib/quanstro/src/nupas - erik

Re: [9fans] vx32 @ FreeBSD: -Ilibvxc/include missing?

2008-07-10 Thread Russ Cox
> gcc -c -o vxa/vorbis/libvorbis/lib/analysis.ho -Ivxa/vorbis > -Ivxa/vorbis/libogg/include -Ivxa/vorbis/libvorbis/include > -DHAVE_ALLOCA_H -g -O3 -MD -std=gnu99 -I. > vxa/vorbis/libvorbis/lib/analysis.c > In file included from vxa/vorbis/libvorbis/lib/bitrate.h:23, > from vxa/vor

Re: [9fans] why not Lvx for Plan 9?

2008-07-10 Thread ron minnich
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 6:47 AM, Russ Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If linuxemu can run Opera, I would imagine you can > use it to run Gimp too, with some work. If you want > an imap client, you could compile the p9p upas/fs > which can easily handle large remote IMAP mailboxes. speaking of w

[9fans] vx32 @ FreeBSD: 9vx/a/chan.c:1220: error: conflicting types for 'memrchr'

2008-07-10 Thread Nikolai Saoukh
$ uname -a FreeBSD NetFaker 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #13: Wed Jul 2 15:04:57 MSD 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NETFAKER i386 $ gmake gcc -g -O3 -MD -std=gnu99 -I. -I. -I9vx -I9vx/a -Wall -Wno-missing-braces -c -o 9vx/a/chan.o 9vx/a/chan.c 9vx/a/chan.c:1220: error: conflict

Re: [9fans] Can't install Plan9 on VMWare

2008-07-10 Thread Philip Silva
> you don't need to increase the size of 9fat, either and you > don't need a swap partition at all. with 800mb i would partition > the disk like: > > 9fat 20mb > nvram 512 bytes > fossil700 mb Thank you for your help! This worked out... But now there's a new problem: After installing it

Re: [9fans] Can't install Plan9 on VMWare

2008-07-10 Thread erik quanstrom
> Thank you for your help! This worked out... > > But now there's a new problem: After installing it and rebooting the > computer, everything seems normal until the message "init: > starting /bin/rc". Nothing happens then although the computer does not > freeze (keyboard input is shown on the scre

Re: [9fans] Can't install Plan9 on VMWare

2008-07-10 Thread john
>> you don't need to increase the size of 9fat, either and you >> don't need a swap partition at all. with 800mb i would partition >> the disk like: >> >> 9fat 20mb >> nvram 512 bytes >> fossil700 mb > Thank you for your help! This worked out... > > But now there's a new problem: After

Re: [9fans] why not Lvx for Plan 9?

2008-07-10 Thread Charles Forsyth
> speaking of which, did Cinap's fixes for the gs segment make it in so > we have thread local storage a la linux now? plan 9 provides that portably as the stack segment, and provides some reserved space in it via _privates [see exec(2)]. (it might be helpful to have some conventions for its use.

Re: [9fans] Can't install Plan9 on VMWare

2008-07-10 Thread Philip Silva
> Remove the CD-ROM drive from your VMware configuration and boot. > > John Thanks a lot! Problem solved... Still weird :-) Philip

Re: [9fans] Can't install Plan9 on VMWare

2008-07-10 Thread Federico G. Benavento
> But now there's a new problem: After installing it and rebooting the > computer, everything seems normal until the message "init: > starting /bin/rc". Nothing happens then although the computer does not > freeze (keyboard input is shown on the screen). you either remove the cdrom from the virtua

Re: [9fans] why not Lvx for Plan 9?

2008-07-10 Thread ron minnich
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 9:33 AM, Charles Forsyth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> speaking of which, did Cinap's fixes for the gs segment make it in so >> we have thread local storage a la linux now? > > > or did you mean in linuxemu? yes. linuxemu needed a kernel change IIRC and I was wondering if

Re: [9fans] vx32 @ FreeBSD: 9vx/a/chan.c:1220: error: conflicting types for 'memrchr'

2008-07-10 Thread Martin Neubauer
FreeBSD added memrchr to its libc a couple of weeks ago. The system one uses size_t for the len argument; the 9vx one long. Changing that to unsigned long probably would make the compiler happy but would most likely choke the linker up. I chickened out and just commented out the definition in chan.

[9fans] Bgetrune while(i>runesize) loop

2008-07-10 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
Hello. I was looking at the code for the Bgetrune function trying to implement a readrune() around read(). It works, but without a counterpart for this: while(i > bp->runesize) { Bungetc(bp); i--; } What is the p

Re: [9fans] Bgetrune while(i>runesize) loop

2008-07-10 Thread Russ Cox
> Hello. I was looking at the code for the Bgetrune function trying to > implement a readrune() around read(). It works, but without a > counterpart for this: > > while(i > bp->runesize) { > Bungetc(bp); > i--; > } > > Wh

Re: [9fans] 9vx on OpenBSD-4.3

2008-07-10 Thread Malik Bazz
Me again - Were you successfull in porting 9vx to OpenBSD? If you need some testing help, contact me. Greetings, Malik

Re: [9fans] 9vx on OpenBSD-4.3

2008-07-10 Thread Brian L. Stuart
> Me again - Were you successfull in porting 9vx to OpenBSD? > If you need some testing help, contact me. Speaking of that, does anyone have an idea where NetBSD would fit into that? Of the bunch, that's the one I've used most and have deployed in the most places. I would think there would be so

Re: [9fans] 9vx on OpenBSD-4.3

2008-07-10 Thread Iruata Souza
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Malik Bazz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Me again - Were you successfull in porting 9vx to OpenBSD? > If you need some testing help, contact me. > http://iru.oitobits.net/src/vx32-0.10-openbsd-compiled.tgz I guess you'll have problems compiling. Let me know if you d

Re: [9fans] 9vx on OpenBSD-4.3

2008-07-10 Thread Iruata Souza
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 4:11 PM, Brian L. Stuart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Me again - Were you successfull in porting 9vx to OpenBSD? >> If you need some testing help, contact me. > > Speaking of that, does anyone have an idea where NetBSD > would fit into that? Of the bunch, that's the one I'

Re: [9fans] why not Lvx for Plan 9?

2008-07-10 Thread ron minnich
futex? so do we need a futtocks device? ron

[9fans] plan9port -> ftpfs

2008-07-10 Thread Enrico Weigelt
Hi folks, did anyone already port ftpfs to plan9port ? thx -- -- Enrico Weigelt, metux IT service -- http://www.metux.de/ cellphone: +49 174 7066481 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] skype: nekrad666 -

Re: [9fans] why not Lvx for Plan 9?

2008-07-10 Thread cinap_lenrek
Ok, here is the thing... Here are 2 versions of linux libc tls and notls. (Current linux distries just ship with the tls version i think, but here may be exceptions) TLS is a libpthread thing that is heavily wired together with libc on linux. (just do an ldd on something like ls) TLS uses the tw

Re: [9fans] 9vx on OpenBSD-4.3

2008-07-10 Thread Nick LaForge
>>> Me again - Were you successfull in porting 9vx to OpenBSD? >>> If you need some testing help, contact me. >> >> Speaking of that, does anyone have an idea where NetBSD >> would fit into that? Of the bunch, that's the one I've >> used most and have deployed in the most places. I >> would think

Re: [9fans] Bgetrune while(i>runesize) loop

2008-07-10 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
I got nothing spectacular from that, but changing the \x00s to QRS gave me something interesting: without the loop, readrune gives me [?]S, but with it it, it gives me [?]QRS, like cat would've. Would this be because fullrune doesn't check for validity, and if chartorune fails then the poss

Re: [9fans] Bgetrune while(i>runesize) loop

2008-07-10 Thread Russ Cox
> Would this be because fullrune doesn't check for validity, and if > chartorune fails then the possibility of eating too much comes about? Mostly, yes. The fundamental issue is that, presented with malformed UTF-8, chartorune needs to look at more bytes than the number it returns. Russ

[9fans] xd bug

2008-07-10 Thread Pietro Gagliardi
Hello. Regarding my previous question, the file /n/sources/contrib/ pietro/xd.out shows a bug in xd regarding characters that can't be printed with the %c format. There should be no space between a non- printing and a printing character; but the two spaces screw the rest of the line up. This

Re: [9fans] plan9port -> ftpfs

2008-07-10 Thread Michael Teichgräber
> did anyone already port ftpfs to plan9port ? > > thx Last year I tried to port it, see the tarball containing ftpfs and the mercurial history of my changes: http://wmipf.in-berlin.de/ftpfs-p9p-hg.tar.gz It works basically, but some problems remain (from the readme): - "mv" does

Re: [9fans] 9vx on OpenBSD-4.3

2008-07-10 Thread Uriel
> i'm interested in netbsd as a replacement for linux to serve 9p in > small ARM machines... i could use this Why not Inferno? (Native or hosted) uriel

Re: [9fans] 9vx on OpenBSD-4.3

2008-07-10 Thread Nick LaForge
>> i'm interested in netbsd as a replacement for linux to serve 9p in >> small ARM machines... i could use this > > Why not Inferno? (Native or hosted) > > uriel > > thanks, i'd overlooked that option I must say though that having to re-target to limbo is a minus. Is there a 'plan9 c' to dis com

Re: [9fans] 9vx on OpenBSD-4.3

2008-07-10 Thread Brian L. Stuart
> >> i'm interested in netbsd as a replacement for linux to serve 9p in > >> small ARM machines... i could use this > > > > Why not Inferno? (Native or hosted) > > > > uriel > > thanks, i'd overlooked that option > > I must say though that having to re-target to limbo is a minus. Is > there a 'p