Dear 9fans,
in order to be able to do administrative tasks through drawterm I
habe added the following to my cpurc:
srvfs nimda /
Then I expected to mount /mnt/keys and friends in a drawterm as
bootes like this:
mount -bc /srv/nimda /
A ls /mnt/keys now shows the existing loaded keys. A auth/c
To give you some more information:
It seems that auth/changeuser hangs in reading from /dev/cons:
cpu% ps | grep changeuser
bootes 22760:00 0:00 72K Preadchangeuser
cpu% acid 2276
/proc/2276/text:386 plan 9 executable
/sys/lib/acid/port
/sys/lib/acid/386
acid: stk()
pread(
gdiaz found my error: of course if I buÃnd -b /n/root / /dev/cons
of the server is used and not one of the stacked from the drawterms...
just binding the mnt dir resolves this issue.
I officially owe gdiaz some beer.
Sorry for the noise!
Christian
--
You may use my gpg key for replies:
pub 1
> Dear 9fans,
>
> in order to be able to do administrative tasks through drawterm I
> habe added the following to my cpurc:
[...]
it's really worth setting up a serial console and console server to avoid
these issues. at home i use cec. there's a patch here
/n/sources/patch/saved
it's a
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:48 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> APE does not include EWOULDBLOCK in its . I have a feeling
> that no syscall will return EWOULDBLOCK as an error code, so I fail to
> see any reason not to include it. Am I missing something?
If it's not there, and someone uses
> APE does not include EWOULDBLOCK in its . I have a feeling
> that no syscall will return EWOULDBLOCK as an error code, so I fail to
> see any reason not to include it. Am I missing something?
I think it's common on UNIX systems for EWOULDBLOCK to be a synonym for EAGAIN.
I'm seeking advice.
APE does not include EWOULDBLOCK in its . I have a feeling
that no syscall will return EWOULDBLOCK as an error code, so I fail to
see any reason not to include it. Am I missing something?
++L
Is it possible to modify the live cd isos to list an option that would
allow booting with the *nomp=1 option set? It seems to prevent the
ability for me to use vesa modes on my dual core Thinkpad T60, and as
a result the coloring looks really screwed up. Dark green background,
terminals with black
I've got a vmware instance that I use w/ the 9pccpuf kernel since
drawterm connections work much more successfully than using vmware's
gui drivers. Unfortunately, I also use 9pcf and log in as glenda in
the terminal (installed that way, migrated to the cpu kernel) so some
of the file owner
> I think it's common on UNIX systems for EWOULDBLOCK to be a synonym for
> EAGAIN.
that's correct, at least acording to my POSIX man pages I have in the
posix-man contrib package.
--
Federico G. Benavento
> I've got a vmware instance that I use w/ the 9pccpuf kernel since
> drawterm connections work much more successfully than using vmware's
> gui drivers. Unfortunately, I also use 9pcf and log in as glenda in
> the terminal (installed that way, migrated to the cpu kernel) so some
> of the
a couple of weeks ago brucee and i were looking for "wood block" on linux :)
here's a little torture: which header file has the errno's on linux?
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 12:09 PM, Federico G. Benavento
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think it's common on UNIX systems for EWOULDBLOCK to be a syn
well to be honest i did use up more than my share of wood blocks ...
but my fire was raging. in the early 80s when a thousand new errnos
were introduced it was a cocktail afternoon at basser, and i think it
was andrew taylor who looked at ENAMELON and exclaimed "And A Melon?"
... so i made melon da
On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Skip Tavakkolian
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> a couple of weeks ago brucee and i were looking for "wood block" on linux :)
>
> here's a little torture: which header file has the errno's on linux?
All of them.
ron
14 matches
Mail list logo
