>> > you can try using the pc i8253.c for pcpae, and see if that solves
>> > the issue.
>>
>> As you know, it's not so easy.
>> For example, pc i8253.c kernel wants watchdog(), and
>> different Mach structure which you changed, etc.
>
> i ment the i8253.c from the atom pc kernel. i thought
> tha
Fixed!
On 09/04/2014 1:13 PM, wrote:
> > so basically the timing loop is messed up. if you could run the amd64
> > kernel on this machine, this will not happen.
>
> Before I do this, I tried the 'sources' pc kernel for 2 cpu.
> It recognizes 2 cpus and has no problem.
>
> Kenji
>
>
>
> > you can try using the pc i8253.c for pcpae, and see if that solves
> > the issue.
>
> As you know, it's not so easy.
> For example, pc i8253.c kernel wants watchdog(), and
> different Mach structure which you changed, etc.
i ment the i8253.c from the atom pc kernel. i thought
that was unders
> you can try using the pc i8253.c for pcpae, and see if that solves
> the issue.
As you know, it's not so easy.
For example, pc i8253.c kernel wants watchdog(), and
different Mach structure which you changed, etc.
I know I lost about 800MB of my memory.☺
However, stability is the most important
On Tue Apr 8 23:12:24 EDT 2014, kokam...@hera.eonet.ne.jp wrote:
> > so basically the timing loop is messed up. if you could run the amd64
> > kernel on this machine, this will not happen.
>
> Before I do this, I tried the 'sources' pc kernel for 2 cpu.
> It recognizes 2 cpus and has no problem
I forgot.
This mail is using 'sources' pc kernel for 2 cpu, and
nupas mail system.
Kenji
> so basically the timing loop is messed up. if you could run the amd64
> kernel on this machine, this will not happen.
Before I do this, I tried the 'sources' pc kernel for 2 cpu.
It recognizes 2 cpus and has no problem.
Kenji
On Tue Apr 8 22:58:29 EDT 2014, kokam...@hera.eonet.ne.jp wrote:
> > if you tried all the other debugging suggestions, you could also type
> > f7, which will print all the usb kbd input on the console.
> >
> > i don't see any issues in the sos output.
>
> My 2cpu machine goes 10 times faster tha
> if you tried all the other debugging suggestions, you could also type
> f7, which will print all the usb kbd input on the console.
>
> i don't see any issues in the sos output.
My 2cpu machine goes 10 times faster than 1cpu.
This happens on also the pc kernel (not pcpae).
Kenji
these errors
init: starting /bin/rc
i8042: fe returned to the f5 command
i8042: fe returned to the f6 command
usually happen when mouseport=ps2 or mouseport=ps2intellimouse
when there is only a a usb mouse. set mouseport=usb.
if you tried all the other debugging suggesti
> However, one point I should report here is that it may not be
> concerned only keyboard. I experienced the one window
> for fscons did not open, and some error messages ( I forgot)
> were there. I suppose this is not related to keyboard, right?
i'm going to start off with the assumption that
> can you run sos/sos and copy or email the output?
> sos itself gives instructions.
I'll email you soon.
However, one point I should report here is that it may not be
concerned only keyboard. I experienced the one window
for fscons did not open, and some error messages ( I forgot)
were there.
On Sat Apr 5 03:58:14 EDT 2014, kokam...@hera.eonet.ne.jp wrote:
> Eric,
>
> I reported I had no problem to use pcpae kernel so far.
> This time, I must report a problem.
>
> I switched from 1CPU mode to 2CPU mode, and have
> problem of too much high speed of keyboard input,
> like aaa w
13 matches
Mail list logo
