Re: [9fans] plan9 on qemu and 9vx

2010-03-14 Thread hugo rivera
It seems that 9vx has become a lot more stable than before. The last time I used it to write anything in C was like 8 months ago, and the instability issues I had in mind are dated from back then. So I'll give it another try and perhaps it will become my main plan 9 platform. 2010/3/13 ron minnich

Re: [9fans] plan9 on qemu and 9vx

2010-03-13 Thread EBo
> > So, are you more interested in 9vx than lguest?  Or have I > > misinterpreted what you ment by stuck ;-) > > Just going by performance and portability, 9vx is a way better way to > go than lguest. I have to take a look at it later then. EBo --

Re: [9fans] plan9 on qemu and 9vx

2010-03-13 Thread ron minnich
On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:38 AM, EBo wrote: > So, are you more interested in 9vx than lguest?  Or have I misinterpreted what > you ment by stuck ;-) Just going by performance and portability, 9vx is a way better way to go than lguest. ron

Re: [9fans] plan9 on qemu and 9vx

2010-03-13 Thread EBo
> Unless there's some compelling reason to use qemu (I can't think of > one) why not just use 9vx exclusively? I've made a transition over the > years: > qemu > xen > kvm > lguest > 9vx > > And am stuck at 9vx ... So, are you more interested in 9vx than lguest? Or have I misinterpreted what you

Re: [9fans] plan9 on qemu and 9vx

2010-03-13 Thread ron minnich
I build 9vx from source and routinely have it running for days, until I need an ubongo reboot in fact. Don't know how to figure out what's different but I do know that gcc/glibc/distros in linux universe are so variable, literally week to week, that the build environment is very unstable. That migh

Re: [9fans] plan9 on qemu and 9vx

2010-03-13 Thread hugo rivera
2010/3/13, Tim Newsham : > Are you running the latest from sources, or are you using > the prebuilt binary? There are important stability fixes > in the sources that aren't in the binary (unless its been updated > recently). > Prebuilt binary, downloaded on Feb/22/2010. -- Hugo

Re: [9fans] plan9 on qemu and 9vx

2010-03-12 Thread erik quanstrom
> > gcc's different % rounding > > hmm? i'm sorry. totally wrong. i thought i remembered and i didn't. it was a different problem entirely. i found i had to make loads of changes like the following /sys/src/9/ip/devip.c:47,53 - /mnt/term/home/quanstro/hg2/vx32.old/src/9vx/a/ip/devip.c:47,53

Re: [9fans] plan9 on qemu and 9vx

2010-03-12 Thread Russ Cox
> i find development to go very fast on plan 9. depends how many machines you have. > gcc's different % rounding hmm? russ

Re: [9fans] plan9 on qemu and 9vx

2010-03-12 Thread erik quanstrom
> believe it or not, I even do that on 9vx. For many things, esp. things > in port, it's good enough for me. In fact I did a "curried pipe" in > 9vx just to try some things out. i find development to go very fast on plan 9. now that /dev/reboot $kern is working for me, i can restart the kernel in

Re: [9fans] plan9 on qemu and 9vx

2010-03-12 Thread Tim Newsham
9vx crashes on me quite often, and qemu doesn't. That's the only reason I use qemu, otherwise I'd also be stuck with 9vx too :-) Are you running the latest from sources, or are you using the prebuilt binary? There are important stability fixes in the sources that aren't in the binary (unless it

Re: [9fans] plan9 on qemu and 9vx

2010-03-12 Thread ron minnich
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 3:04 PM, Gorka Guardiola wrote: > On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 5:53 PM, ron minnich wrote: >> Unless there's some compelling reason to use qemu (I can't think of >> one) > > Debugging the kernel. believe it or not, I even do that on 9vx. For many things, esp. things in port, i

Re: [9fans] plan9 on qemu and 9vx

2010-03-12 Thread Gorka Guardiola
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 5:53 PM, ron minnich wrote: > Unless there's some compelling reason to use qemu (I can't think of > one) Debugging the kernel. -- - curiosity sKilled the cat

Re: [9fans] plan9 on qemu and 9vx

2010-03-12 Thread ron minnich
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 9:02 AM, hugo rivera wrote: > 9vx crashes on me quite often, and qemu doesn't. That's the only > reason I use qemu, otherwise I'd also be stuck with 9vx too :-) GSOC proposal: build tool to make 9vx failures easier and improve the reliability of 9vx ron

Re: [9fans] plan9 on qemu and 9vx

2010-03-12 Thread hugo rivera
9vx crashes on me quite often, and qemu doesn't. That's the only reason I use qemu, otherwise I'd also be stuck with 9vx too :-) 2010/3/12 ron minnich : > Unless there's some compelling reason to use qemu (I can't think of > one) why not just use 9vx exclusively? I've made a transition over the >

Re: [9fans] plan9 on qemu and 9vx

2010-03-12 Thread ron minnich
Unless there's some compelling reason to use qemu (I can't think of one) why not just use 9vx exclusively? I've made a transition over the years: qemu xen kvm lguest 9vx And am stuck at 9vx ... ron

Re: [9fans] plan9 on qemu and 9vx

2010-03-12 Thread yy
2010/3/12 hugo rivera : > But the next step I want to take is to run just a terminal with qemu, Since it looks like you have the option, I would not suggest to use a qemu image as your terminal. Instead, make 9vx or drawterm your terminal and you will have access to your host file system for free

Re: [9fans] plan9 on qemu and 9vx

2010-03-12 Thread maht
On 12/03/2010 10:53, hugo rivera wrote: Hello, I have a Slackware installation running on my box. On top of it, I often use qemu to run plan9, but it's inconvenient to constantly keep track of the things I do there, like C programs, because many of them are also useful under Slackware (then I com