On Jan 25, 2009, at 8:43 PM, andrey mirtchovski wrote:
A quick look at npfs and spfs suggests that neither support p9sk1
auth? Am
I misreading?
one user-level 9p server/client which supports p9sk1 is Tim's python
9P library.
Which should be a relatively easy way to add a 9pserve to hg.
>Even more off topic - why do people think regular password expiry improves
>system security (as opposed to enforcing a password complexity constraint)?
i think the UNIX security paper discussed that.
(F. Grampp and R. Morris, "UNIX Operating System Security", BSTJ, Vol. 62, No .
8,. 1984)
> ... it'd be nice if there was some way for a factotum
> protocol to generate a key that stayed in long term storage (i.e. in secstore)
> but currently, i don't think there's a way to do it, other
> than manually.
I was needing this recently - I have to change my windows filserver password
every
>it's a bit awkward doing inferno auth with factotum, as you
>have to manually manipulate the keys generated by the login(6)
>process.
at the moment if you use Inferno's auth/ai2key once (for each authinfo-format
file)
you can add the resulting keys in text form to your secstore for later use by
it's a bit awkward doing inferno auth with factotum, as you
have to manually manipulate the keys generated by the login(6)
process. it'd be nice if there was some way for a factotum
protocol to generate a key that stayed in long term storage (i.e. in secstore)
but currently, i don't think there's a
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:39 PM, Uriel wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Eric Van Hensbergen
> > Authentication isn't currently supported by any
> of the UNIX servers (to my knowledge).
>
> At least Inferno and one python 9p implementation do auth on Unix servers.
>
Again, Inferno can
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Eric Van Hensbergen
> Authentication isn't currently supported by any
of the UNIX servers (to my knowledge).
At least Inferno and one python 9p implementation do auth on Unix servers.
uriel
> A quick look at npfs and spfs suggests that neither support p9sk1 auth? Am
> I misreading?
one user-level 9p server/client which supports p9sk1 is Tim's python 9P library.
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 08:49:57AM -0600, Eric Van Hensbergen wrote:
> For servers there are lots of choices, but spfs/npfs are the only ones
> (I know of) which support the UNIX extensions (for things like UID
> mapping, etc.)
A quick look at npfs and spfs suggests that neither support p9sk1 auth
It sounded more like he wanted a UNIX based auth server, perhaps I misread.
-eric
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 8:58 AM, Steve Simon wrote:
>> Authentication isn't
>> currently supported by any of the UNIX servers (to my knowledge).
>
> Maybe it doesn't count in your eyes, but I use u9fs to
> Authentication isn't
> currently supported by any of the UNIX servers (to my knowledge).
Maybe it doesn't count in your eyes, but I use u9fs to serve
unix filesystems to plan9 - it supports authenticiation.
-Steve
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Jakob Praher wrote:
>
> I have read a post from Eric Van Hensbergen about paravirtualized
> filesystems. This was of interest to me, and I tried to pull npfs from
> subversion. As a client I am using the 9pfuse to mount the tree of the
> npfs server. Is this a good
12 matches
Mail list logo
