Re: [9fans] lisp again.

2009-09-07 Thread Iruata Souza
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 10:53 AM, erik quanstrom wrote: >> maybe the bootstrap can be done with linuxemu. > > wouldn't that just give you yet another linux elf binary? > you are right. it must know how to compile correct a.out(6). iru

Re: [9fans] lisp again.

2009-09-07 Thread Iruata Souza
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 9:54 AM, John Floren wrote: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 8:47 AM, LiteStar numnums wrote: >> Well, lisp != common lisp aside, I wouldn't mind a native CL system. I >> haven't looked at the SBCL backend in quite sometime, but, assuming it's not >> terribly insane, that would be a

Re: [9fans] lisp again.

2009-09-07 Thread erik quanstrom
> maybe the bootstrap can be done with linuxemu. wouldn't that just give you yet another linux elf binary? - erik

Re: [9fans] lisp again.

2009-09-07 Thread LiteStar numnums
I was going to use SBCL to cross compile SBCL for Plan9. On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 8:54 AM, John Floren wrote: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 8:47 AM, LiteStar numnums > wrote: > > Well, lisp != common lisp aside, I wouldn't mind a native CL system. I > > haven't looked at the SBCL backend in quite somet

Re: [9fans] lisp again.

2009-09-07 Thread LiteStar numnums
Clozure might be enough as well; it's C, but I've no idea how many POSIXisms are in the source... On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Fernan Bolando wrote: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 8:54 PM, John Floren wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 8:47 AM, LiteStar numnums > wrote: > >> Well, lisp != common lisp

Re: [9fans] lisp again.

2009-09-07 Thread Fernan Bolando
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 8:54 PM, John Floren wrote: > On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 8:47 AM, LiteStar numnums wrote: >> Well, lisp != common lisp aside, I wouldn't mind a native CL system. I >> haven't looked at the SBCL backend in quite sometime, but, assuming it's not >> terribly insane, that would be a

Re: [9fans] lisp again.

2009-09-07 Thread John Floren
On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 8:47 AM, LiteStar numnums wrote: > Well, lisp != common lisp aside, I wouldn't mind a native CL system. I > haven't looked at the SBCL backend in quite sometime, but, assuming it's not > terribly insane, that would be a decent route. Most CL work that isn't > specific to one

Re: [9fans] lisp again.

2009-09-07 Thread LiteStar numnums
Well, lisp != common lisp aside, I wouldn't mind a native CL system. I haven't looked at the SBCL backend in quite sometime, but, assuming it's not terribly insane, that would be a decent route. Most CL work that isn't specific to one of the proprietary systems (Allegro, LispWorks, &c.) is written