On Thu May 12 14:22:16 EDT 2011, fors...@terzarima.net wrote:
> is at worst inefficient. the kproc doesn't, however, share memory with
> the current proc, and i don't think it needs to do anything at all.
> (even if memory were shared, a new process starts with an empty mmu state.)
> the comment is
>it could (just for one example) have exited and been cleaned up
>before p is dereferenced to set newtlb = 1.
it wouldn't matter since processes aren't deallocated, and an extra newtlb
is at worst inefficient. the kproc doesn't, however, share memory with
the current proc, and i don't think it nee
