Re: [9fans] interaction of net.alt and factotum

2010-12-14 Thread erik quanstrom
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 01:00:33PM +, Steve Simon wrote: > > Is there a way to hook into the napespace of factotum (I beleive there was > > a kernel > > patch to make /proc/??/ns writable which should do it but I was hoping for > > a solution > > that just used "a clever plan9 trick" > > I

Re: [9fans] interaction of net.alt and factotum

2010-12-14 Thread Nathaniel W Filardo
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 01:00:33PM +, Steve Simon wrote: > Is there a way to hook into the napespace of factotum (I beleive there was a > kernel > patch to make /proc/??/ns writable which should do it but I was hoping for a > solution > that just used "a clever plan9 trick" I needed read acc

Re: [9fans] interaction of net.alt and factotum

2010-12-14 Thread Steve Simon
[60 files] > what about building /net.alt in /lib/namespace or /lib/namespace.$machine? I think there is another wrinkle I forgot to mention, when I import my /net.alt I do this over an authenticated connection to another plan9 machine. This needs my key which is held in factotum, so factotum mu

Re: [9fans] interaction of net.alt and factotum

2010-12-14 Thread erik quanstrom
> Am I missing a trick here or is this just how it is? what about building /net.alt in /lib/namespace or /lib/namespace.$machine? - erik