> kenfs:
> http://plan9.bell-labs.com/sys/doc/fs/fs.pdf
> http://plan9.bell-labs.com/who/seanq/cw.pdf
> http://plan9.bell-labs.com/magic/man2html/4/fs
there are some other man pages for ken's fs, too.
the versions i have are a bit different than the sources versions
http://www.q
This write-up would make an excellent wiki page, "File System
Comparison" perhaps. Erik's additional notes should probably be
included, or perhaps put in a separate kenfs page. I could make the
pages if desired.
On 13 Aug 2010, at 5:31 pm, Steve Simon wrote:
kfs is a simple, non-backed up
> is there any source where I could read about differences between kfs
> and fossil (also I heard about something like cwfs), about reasons why
> fossil was designed and superceded, when to use which and alike?
steve's summary is excellent. a few more words about my favorite,
ken's fs
the "worm"
thanks for pointers!
R
kfs is a simple, non-backed up filesystem designed for stand alone machines
kenfs is the older main file server, it runs stand alone on a single machine
and can use either magnetic disks or WORM disks and provides access to previous
backups online. it supports a narrower range of hardware than the
