On 03/05/2010 07:02 AM, ge...@plan9.bell-labs.com wrote:
> Can you provide more details of your `ipconfig ra6 recvra 1' failure?
> What happens? What's printed? What's in /sys/log/v6routeradv (you
> may have to create it first)?
cpu% touch /sys/log/v6routeradv
cpu% ip/ipconfig -6
cpu% ip/ipconfi
On 03/04/2010 11:42 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
>>
>> 2) Add support for more SATA/AHCI controlers; I have:
>>
> [...]
>> 00:05.0 SATA controller [0106]: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] AHCI
>> IDE Controller (0106) [1039:1185] (rev 03)
>>
>> is seems to be supported by the 9load and, or kernel, but
ron minnich wrote:
...
I think the opportunities for doing good Plan 9 work on ARM are going
to grow quite a bit. It may well prove a better platform for the
future than PCs, which are increasingly closed and esoteric.
The company i am working for is using ARM processor platforms
for industri
> I think a broken table would make a better platform than a PC, and it
> seems to be getting worse.
this may be true. but can you name another platform?
arm is a cpu grab bag, not a platform.
> It certainly seems like there is a slight renewed interest in RISC
> machines.
alternatve interp
On Thu Mar 4 17:15:19 EST 2010, david.eckha...@cs.cmu.edu wrote:
> > for example, there are a number of 10/100 chipsets that have
> > good documentation that's under 100 pages. complete with
> > (oh, my) a theory of operation.
>
> Such as?
and
On Thu Mar 4 20:28:36 EST 2010, ge...@plan9.bell-
Can you provide more details of your `ipconfig ra6 recvra 1' failure?
What happens? What's printed? What's in /sys/log/v6routeradv (you
may have to create it first)?
It's not worth supporting any new 10Mb ethernet controllers,
and new 100Mb ones are borderline.
On Mar 4, 2010, at 4:13 PM, ron minnich wrote:
The big thing I'd like to see as a GSOC project, and which I think is
doable, is a first-class set of drivers for the beagle and/or IGEP.
The beagle is cheap and would be a very nice terminal.
It's close on some fronts. We really need video. USB
The big thing I'd like to see as a GSOC project, and which I think is
doable, is a first-class set of drivers for the beagle and/or IGEP.
The beagle is cheap and would be a very nice terminal.
It's close on some fronts. We really need video. USB is not there yet.
There are other problems. At the
> > 2) Add support for more SATA/AHCI controlers; I have:
>
> FWIW, GSoC projects that amount to ``add some drivers for my non-linux
> OS!'' have historically been unpopular, unfinished, and generally
> unloved projects (perhaps barring last year, when I didn't really pay
> attention). I recommen
> 2) Add support for more SATA/AHCI controlers; I have:
FWIW, GSoC projects that amount to ``add some drivers for my non-linux OS!''
have historically been unpopular, unfinished, and generally unloved projects
(perhaps barring last year, when I didn't really pay attention). I recommend
agains
>
> 2) Add support for more SATA/AHCI controlers; I have:
>
[...]
> 00:05.0 SATA controller [0106]: Silicon Integrated Systems [SiS] AHCI
> IDE Controller (0106) [1039:1185] (rev 03)
>
> is seems to be supported by the 9load and, or kernel, but I could not
> install neither the plan9 not 9atom o
On 03/04/2010 04:41 AM, Tim Newsham wrote:
> Some people were asking on #plan9 -- will there be any GSOC
> projects this year? Time is ticking down.
What about?
1) Improving IPv6 stack, particularly the router advertisements part,
ip/ipconfig -6 # works fine
ip/ipconfig ra6 rec
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 6:40 PM, David Leimbach wrote:
> What's the current state of the following:
...
> 3. Cpu from Inferno to Plan 9? (i think this might be in npe's inferno
> fork)
...
Yep, its there. :D
-- vs
What's the current state of the following:
1. 9vx
2. 9null
3. Cpu from Inferno to Plan 9? (i think this might be in npe's inferno
fork)
4. Inferno DS? (Is anyone still interested in it?)
5. SSH2?
6. LinuxEMU improvements?
I'm sure there's plenty of ideas floating around people could work on.
Da
14 matches
Mail list logo
