also note, you can still access these magic filenames in windows
thru a unc path.
like \\somemachine\someshare\path\to\magic\file\aux
or when mapped as a dos drive:
\\?\X:\path\to\magic\file\aux
--
cinap
> I found a quite strange effect with cifs (plan9 bell labs edition).
> I use cifs to mount werc installations from p9p linux servers.
> Cifs is needed here, as the virtual hosted machine does not support nfs.
> Maybe I should switch to another userspace filesystem, but for now its cifs.
> Any n
dexen deVries wrote:
|On Wednesday 28 of August 2013 10:26:01 Erik Quanstrom wrote:
|> the claim that the devices are in the directories and thus the file system
|> is still false. even if explorer has some unnecessary code. and plan 9 is
|> not immune from unnecessary weird bits e.g. the ex
erik quanstrom wrote:
|> > cifs is Windows, i think.
|> > If this is the case, then you may run into the issue of implicit
|> > filenames. Search «aux tale», or browse
|> > .
|
|as entertaining as this is, is isn't true for dos. there
|are no device files on dos in *any* directory. they
>
> not sure why FAT32 would be relevant here, since he's using a linux
> cifs server from an ext fs. samba mangles reserved names much as it
> mangles long filenames -- check mangle_hash2.c for examples. when
> samba is deciding if a filename needs to be mangled, it checks for
> reserve
ybe.
> > Ciao
> >
> > |cheers
> > |
> > |ingo krabbe
> >
> > --steffen
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Steffen Daode Nurpmeso
> To: Fans of the OS Plan 9 from Bell Labs <9fans@9fans.net>
> Cc:
> Date: Wed,
Quoting dexen deVries :
On Wednesday 28 of August 2013 10:26:01 Erik Quanstrom wrote:
the claim that the devices are in the directories and thus the file system
is still false. even if explorer has some unnecessary code. and plan 9 is
not immune from unnecessary weird bits e.g. the export pro
On Wednesday 28 of August 2013 10:26:01 Erik Quanstrom wrote:
> the claim that the devices are in the directories and thus the file system
> is still false. even if explorer has some unnecessary code. and plan 9 is
> not immune from unnecessary weird bits e.g. the export protocol.
a somewhat o
the claim that the devices are in the directories and thus the file system is
still false. even if explorer has some unnecessary code. and plan 9 is not
immune from unnecessary weird bits e.g. the export protocol.
- erik
Kurt H Maier wrote:
>Quoting erik quanstrom :
>
>>> > cifs is Windows
Quoting erik quanstrom :
> cifs is Windows, i think.
> If this is the case, then you may run into the issue of implicit
> filenames. Search «aux tale», or browse
> .
as entertaining as this is, is isn't true for dos. there
are no device files on dos in *any* directory. they
are a fiction of
> > cifs is Windows, i think.
> > If this is the case, then you may run into the issue of implicit
> > filenames. Search «aux tale», or browse
> > .
as entertaining as this is, is isn't true for dos. there
are no device files on dos in *any* directory. they
are a fiction of the executive. now
> Ingo Krabbe wrote:
> |Hey,
> |
> |I found a quite strange effect with cifs (plan9 bell labs edition). \
> |I use cifs to mount werc installations from p9p linux servers. \
> |Cifs is needed here, as the virtual hosted machine does not \
> |support nfs. Maybe I should switch to another user
Ingo Krabbe wrote:
|Hey,
|
|I found a quite strange effect with cifs (plan9 bell labs edition). \
|I use cifs to mount werc installations from p9p linux servers. \
|Cifs is needed here, as the virtual hosted machine does not \
|support nfs. Maybe I should switch to another userspace filesyst
13 matches
Mail list logo
