On Sun Jul 31 13:53:48 EDT 2011, 0in...@gmail.com wrote:
> > OK, cool. How is packet forwarding turned on/off? (Or is it always
> > "on"?)
>
> echo iprouting >/net/ipifc/clone
>
> > How do you specify the routing rules? Somewhere in the NDB?
>
> For example, to route to network 192.168.1.0/24
> This URL is the development repository and I should probably
> extract a proper patch from it.
I put the patches in /n/sources/contrib/djc/nat.
It doesn't need IL, but IL is supported. That's why
the IL patches are included. You can remove the IL
parts if not needed.
--
David du Colombier
> OK, cool. How is packet forwarding turned on/off? (Or is it always
> "on"?)
echo iprouting >/net/ipifc/clone
> How do you specify the routing rules? Somewhere in the NDB?
For example, to route to network 192.168.1.0/24 via 192.168.0.1:
echo add 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.1 >/net/i
erik quanstrom writes:
>> Does anybody know if it's possible to use Plan 9 as an IPv4 router?
>
> plan 9 does a fine job of routing ip4 packets. i used plan 9
> to do that for a 4 months recently during a network renumbering.
>
> if you do this, make sure you've made this revert to ip.c. the
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 5:21 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
> > Does anybody know if it's possible to use Plan 9 as an IPv4 router?
>
> plan 9 does a fine job of routing ip4 packets. i used plan 9
> to do that for a 4 months recently during a network renumbering.
>
> if you do this, make sure you've m
> Does anybody know if it's possible to use Plan 9 as an IPv4 router?
plan 9 does a fine job of routing ip4 packets. i used plan 9
to do that for a 4 months recently during a network renumbering.
if you do this, make sure you've made this revert to ip.c. the
sources version has both lines, whic
> As far, as I know, there was some NAT work in Plan9. But I can't
> remember... Sources of this work is on my work laptop :)
https://hg.9grid.fr/plan9-nat/
I did a NAT implementation some times ago. It's working, but it's
still an early work and I haven't worked on it for few months.
It is impl
> Routing does not imply NAT.
Hi ! I know that :) Routing != NATing :)
As far, as I know, there was some NAT work in Plan9. But I can't
remember... Sources of this work is on my work laptop :)
2011/7/31 Lyndon Nerenberg (VE6BBM/VE7TFX) :
>> Answer is simple - no.
>
>> And, YES, Plan9 CAN route I
> Answer is simple - no.
> And, YES, Plan9 CAN route IP ! :)
You only get to choose one of the above.
Routing does not imply NAT.
Hi !
Answer is simple - no.
But this doesn't mean that you can't use plan9 as a core technology
for router os ;)
Current IP stack doesn't support NAT (dirty hack was made by some
plan9 geek), rate limits and other useless features of lunix router.
Currently lunix router on a ugly and messy MIPS
10 matches
Mail list logo
