Oh, interesting.
Thanks,
Chris
> On Sep 13, 2016, at 8:58 AM, Rob Pike wrote:
>
> This might be one reason.
>
> -rob
>
>
>> On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Chris McGee wrote:
>> Sorry for the spam. Is this mailing list getting my emails?
>>
>> Thanks
>> Chris
>
This might be one reason.
-rob
On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 10:51 PM, Chris McGee wrote:
> Sorry for the spam. Is this mailing list getting my emails?
>
> Thanks
> Chris
>
>
> Sorry for the spam. Is this mailing list getting my emails?
>
Yes.
since it doesn't make sense to both send packets
as fast as possible and to delay randomly between
packets, i think this case is just disallowed.
/n/sources/plan9//sys/src/cmd/ip/ping.c:532,537 - ping.c:532,541
break;
} ARGEND;
+ if(flood && rint){
+
Hello,
ip/ping -r -f www.google.com
io% ip/ping -r -f www.google.com
sending 32 64 byte messages 0 ms apart to icmp!www.google.com!1
ping 34691: suicide: sys: trap: divide error pc=0x3953
0: rtt 9797 µs, avg rtt 9797 µs, ttl = 245
io% ps
...
arisawa 346790:00 0:00 128K Pread
