On Tuesday, 1 September 2020, at 8:21 AM, Ethan Gardener wrote:
> Is there any reason one process group cann't have multiple windows?
By design, each window must have your own private namespace with your own
/dev/* files and although these files have same names when a window write to
one of them,
On Fri, Aug 28, 2020, at 7:04 PM, Leonardo wrote:
> I can see the need for a window have an owner and stay on the screen only if
> your owner stays,
I'm not sure I'm thinking clearly today, but don't we have this? A single
window normally requires at least 3 procs, (keyboard, mouse, output,) so,
These changes are interesting and I don't see any problem with new needs but I
think these changes carry some complexities to window system that can kept
outside in new programs or libraries. Rio runs in your windows a terminal as
default that I think too, and I believe that is possible, to kept
they don't.
On Mon, Jan 27, 2020, 11:00 PM Anthony Sorace wrote:
> I get why someone might want those rio changes, even if they're not for me
> (although some I'm curious about). But can anyone help me understand why
> what they've done to drawterm is desirable? I can't say that resizing the
> w
I get why someone might want those rio changes, even if they're not for me
(although some I'm curious about). But can anyone help me understand why what
they've done to drawterm is desirable? I can't say that resizing the window to
change the scale factor has ever seemed like something I'd want.
On Sun, Jan 5, 2020, at 4:13 PM, hiro wrote:
> i object indeed. it's insulting what they did to those programs.
Indeed! It's been a while since I felt strongly enough to close a page in
disgust. "Transient windows" indeed.
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https
i object indeed. it's insulting what they did to those programs.
--
9fans: 9fans
Permalink:
https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T888cf1c8059b63ab-Me7c8a1a6512eb411860d179b
Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription
under arm working?
сб, 4 янв. 2020 г., 14:05 Mark van Atten :
> For whomever may find this of interest -- the Object Icon project,
> mentioned on this list in passing in August 2018, also caters to Plan
> 9:
>
> The Object Icon object-oriented programming language:
> http://objecticon.sourceforg
