Re: [9fans] Flash

> i don't understand this. your "worm" is magnetic disk, right? > why would you put the ssd in the slow half (the worm) > instead of the fast half (the cache)? the current setup is that the worm and the "cache" are the same speed (in fact, the cache is slower because it's on two disks rather than

Re: [9fans] Flash

> i've been evaluating replacing the worm in the coraid fileserver's > sr15x1 with ssd. so far it looks promising. i don't understand this. your "worm" is magnetic disk, right? why would you put the ssd in the slow half (the worm) instead of the fast half (the cache)? similarly, someone on thi

Re: [9fans] Flash

On Sat Mar 7 00:47:33 EST 2009, j...@eecs.harvard.edu wrote: > On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 12:19:25AM -0500, erik quanstrom wrote: > > > Sadly, if a WORM is your only application, then no one cares. > > > At least not enough to pony up for real peformance. The folks > > > > ask not what a technology

Re: [9fans] Flash Video

2009/2/3 Skip Tavakkolian <9...@9netics.com>: > the original question was about flash video. > > many here seem to have interesting ideas, but obviously > not motivated enough to want to plan/research/read/understand. > > two clues: mpeg4 and rtp I think you mean RTMP. There are a couple of open R

Re: [9fans] Flash Video

On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:48 AM, Akshat Kumar wrote: > 2009/2/3 Skip Tavakkolian <9...@9netics.com>: >> the original question was about flash video. >> >> many here seem to have interesting ideas, but obviously >> not motivated enough to want to plan/research/read/understand. >> >> two clues: mpeg4

Re: [9fans] Flash Video

2009/2/3 Skip Tavakkolian <9...@9netics.com>: > the original question was about flash video. > > many here seem to have interesting ideas, but obviously > not motivated enough to want to plan/research/read/understand. > > two clues: mpeg4 and rtp Thanks, I see there are some RFCs related to RTP, a

Re: [9fans] Flash Video

the original question was about flash video. many here seem to have interesting ideas, but obviously not motivated enough to want to plan/research/read/understand. two clues: mpeg4 and rtp >> By the way, Gnash seems to be quite useful.

Re: [9fans] Flash Video

On Tue, Feb 3, 2009 at 10:44 PM, Eris Discordia wrote: > Very interesting. Thank you. > > By the way, Gnash seems to be quite useful. Well, that depends on what you call useful...

Re: [9fans] Flash Video

Very interesting. Thank you. By the way, Gnash seems to be quite useful. --On Tuesday, February 03, 2009 12:22 PM +0100 Christian Walther wrote: 2009/2/3 Eris Discordia : I don't know of any open source implementations of Flash Player. The software on each platform and for each browser see

Re: [9fans] Flash Video

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Feb 3, 2009, at 5:11 AM, Eris Discordia wrote: I don't know of any open source implementations of Flash Player. The software on each platform and for each browser seems to be (c) Adobe and closed source. Does an open source implementation, how

Re: [9fans] Flash Video

2009/2/3 Eris Discordia : > I don't know of any open source implementations of Flash Player. The > software on each platform and for each browser seems to be (c) Adobe and > closed source. Does an open source implementation, however incomplete, > exist? Well, there is"gnash", which aims to be an o

Re: [9fans] Flash Video

I don't know of any open source implementations of Flash Player. The software on each platform and for each browser seems to be (c) Adobe and closed source. Does an open source implementation, however incomplete, exist? Videos embedded in SWF files are encoded in Sorenson's MPEG-4 profile.

Re: [9fans] Flash Video

2009/2/2 Akshat Kumar : > 2009/2/2 Skip Tavakkolian <9...@9netics.com>: >> it might require a c-section. >> might want to start with VLC or ffmpeg. >> > > My aim was just to get 9fans talking about it. > Hence, the pushing. > > But yes, what information can you provide > about either of those, with

Re: [9fans] Flash Video

2009/2/2 Skip Tavakkolian <9...@9netics.com>: > it might require a c-section. > might want to start with VLC or ffmpeg. > My aim was just to get 9fans talking about it. Hence, the pushing. But yes, what information can you provide about either of those, with regards to porting or creating nativel

Re: [9fans] Flash Video

> if I push hard enough, > I just might give birth to a monster it might require a c-section. might want to start with VLC or ffmpeg.

Re: [9fans] Flash

Rodolfo Garcia (kix) schrieb: I'm currently using opera on debian and I luckily can't seem to find any working flash plugins in the apt repositories. It sometimes sucks not being able to see some pages, but all in all I also think I am more productive now. I don't like the flash blocking. It does

Re: [9fans] Flash

Yeah, i used to have the installer package as deb. But since apt automagically removed it again (and me being too lazy to install such crap by hand) apt saved me a lot of time.

Re: [9fans] Flash

> I'm currently using opera on debian and I luckily can't seem to find > any working flash plugins in the apt repositories. It sometimes sucks > not being able to see some pages, but all in all I also think I am > more productive now. I don't like the flash blocking. It doesn't save > any time, but

Re: [9fans] Flash

I'm currently using opera on debian and I luckily can't seem to find any working flash plugins in the apt repositories. It sometimes sucks not being able to see some pages, but all in all I also think I am more productive now. I don't like the flash blocking. It doesn't save any time, but rather fo

Re: [9fans] Flash

2008/2/10 Richard Uhtenwoldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Paul Lalonde writes: > >If time is the constraint, then just uninstall all your web browsers > If I did that, I would indeed waste less time, but I would also > have to forgo great benefits that I now enjoy. In contrast, I > derived almost no