what's weird is I'm just not seeing any of these problems. Good fun.
ron
In article ,
Greg Comeau wrote:
>In article ,
>Greg Comeau wrote:
>>In article ,
>>Greg Comeau wrote:
>>>As mentioned in a post yesterday, we seem to have succeeded in getting
>>>5c et al built. However, in resuming playing around at least one case
>>>/bin/ape/sh is producing:
>>>./command-name
In article <90f71fcedeb5b45a5bed515862b8a...@hamnavoe.com>,
Richard Miller <9f...@hamnavoe.com> wrote:
>> 1) If it is upgraded to latest version of Snow Leopard (I think 10.6.3?),
>>will anything regarding 9vx.OSX break?
>
>As far as I can tell, 9vx works fine on MacOSX 10.6.7.
Just a note tha
In article ,
Greg Comeau wrote:
>In article ,
>Greg Comeau wrote:
>>As mentioned in a post yesterday, we seem to have succeeded in getting
>>5c et al built. However, in resuming playing around at least one case
>>/bin/ape/sh is producing:
>>
>>./command-name[3]: other-command-name: cannot execut
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 12, 2011, at 8:51 AM, com...@panix.com (Greg Comeau) wrote:
> In article ,
> David Leimbach wrote:
>> On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:44 AM, erik quanstrom wrote:
> the way to do this is
> cd /sys/src; objtype=arm mk && mk clean
Just getting to play with
>> cd /sys/src/cmd
>> for (d in 5?) @{cd $d && mk install}
>>
>>I'm not going to try that now...
>
> I am :) Well, actually, given the /bin/ape/sh problem,
> what I'm going to try to do is try to set up an alternative
> 9vx.OSX install from scratch, and apply the latter above instead
>
In article ,
Lucio De Re wrote:
>>>the way to do this is
>>> cd /sys/src; objtype=arm mk && mk clean
>>
>> Just getting to play with this... had to do some copying of some of
>> the files first among other setbacks... ok, plain mk asks what to make,
>> and so I tried 'mk all' which is sayin
In article ,
David Leimbach wrote:
>On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:44 AM, erik quanstrom wrote:
the way to do this is
cd /sys/src; objtype=arm mk && mk clean
>>>
>>> Just getting to play with this... had to do some copying of some of
>>> the files first among other setbacks... ok, plain mk
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2011, at 3:44 AM, erik quanstrom wrote:
>>> the way to do this is
>>>cd /sys/src; objtype=arm mk && mk clean
>>
>> Just getting to play with this... had to do some copying of some of
>> the files first among other setbacks... ok, plain mk asks what to make
In article ,
Greg Comeau wrote:
>As mentioned in a post yesterday, we seem to have succeeded in getting
>5c et al built. However, in resuming playing around at least one case
>/bin/ape/sh is producing:
>
>./command-name[3]: other-command-name: cannot execute - Access Denied
>
>since doing the mk'
> >the way to do this is
> > cd /sys/src; objtype=arm mk && mk clean
>
> Just getting to play with this... had to do some copying of some of
> the files first among other setbacks... ok, plain mk asks what to make,
> and so I tried 'mk all' which is saying 5c does not exist, but
> that's one
>>the way to do this is
>> cd /sys/src; objtype=arm mk && mk clean
>
> Just getting to play with this... had to do some copying of some of
> the files first among other setbacks... ok, plain mk asks what to make,
> and so I tried 'mk all' which is saying 5c does not exist, but
> that's one
In article ,
ron minnich wrote:
>I regularly build kernels and full bins for arm on 9vx. the biggest
>issue with osx is when you install 9vx on a case-insenstive file
>system: things like /bin/Kill and /bin/kill don't quite work out.
Thanks for the heads up, I seem to have run into this trying
to
In article <784be5fe9a0079d80a76434d252dd...@coraid.com>,
erik quanstrom wrote:
>> 2) If I recall as it was installed a while ago it came with 8c/8l and
>>respective includes/libs already available. However, things like
>>5c and its requirements do not seem to be available by default.
>>
In article <90f71fcedeb5b45a5bed515862b8a...@hamnavoe.com>,
Richard Miller <9f...@hamnavoe.com> wrote:
>> 1) If it is upgraded to latest version of Snow Leopard (I think 10.6.3?),
>>will anything regarding 9vx.OSX break?
>
>As far as I can tell, 9vx works fine on MacOSX 10.6.7.
Great, 9vx is s
In article <784be5fe9a0079d80a76434d252dd...@coraid.com>,
erik quanstrom wrote:
>> 2) If I recall as it was installed a while ago it came with 8c/8l and
>>respective includes/libs already available. However, things like
>>5c and its requirements do not seem to be available by default.
>>
As mentioned in a post yesterday, we seem to have succeeded in getting
5c et al built. However, in resuming playing around at least one case
/bin/ape/sh is producing:
./command-name[3]: other-command-name: cannot execute - Access Denied
since doing the mk's. Obviously something in those builds
On Fri Apr 8 05:10:49 EDT 2011, rogpe...@gmail.com wrote:
> i'm not keen on disks within disks because you either have to waste
> lots of space or risk running out of it.
true, but ...
is disk space your most constrained resource?
is a free byte on disk wasted or not?
i bought the smallest prac
i'm not keen on disks within disks because you either have to waste
lots of space or risk running out of it.
On 7 April 2011 16:45, Paul Lalonde wrote:
> Fortunately you can build a case-insensitive file system on a mac, within a
> file. Disk Utility lets you make a filesystem in a file, and you
> would a better solution be a modification to 9vx to allow it to generate
> virtual
> disks in a file. Then you could start fossil/kfs/cwfs/pacfs/other in plan9 and
> have the same functionality and the ability to have the filesystem work
> exactly
> like plan9 - permissions, dates, append only
would a better solution be a modification to 9vx to allow it to generate virtual
disks in a file. Then you could start fossil/kfs/cwfs/pacfs/other in plan9 and
have the same functionality and the ability to have the filesystem work exactly
like plan9 - permissions, dates, append only files etc.
ju
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Anthony Sorace wrote:
> On Apr 7, 2011, at 11:45, Paul Lalonde wrote:
>
>> Fortunately you can build a case-insensitive file system on a mac, within a
>> file.
>
> Just in case this wasn't obvious, you can do this with the real, on-disk
> filesystem, too. There's
On Apr 7, 2011, at 11:45, Paul Lalonde wrote:
> Fortunately you can build a case-insensitive file system on a mac, within a
> file.
Just in case this wasn't obvious, you can do this with the real, on-disk
filesystem, too. There's no "upgrading" an existing FS, so this is most
practical when ge
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Paul Lalonde wrote:
> Fortunately you can build a case-insensitive file system on a mac, within a
> file. Disk Utility lets you make a filesystem in a file, and you can click
> "case-sensitive". Big win, and though you have to size the FS ahead, it's
> also nice t
1s/case-insensitive/case-sensitive/
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Paul Lalonde wrote:
> Fortunately you can build a case-insensitive file system on a mac, within a
> file. Disk Utility lets you make a filesystem in a file, and you can click
> "case-sensitive". Big win, and though you have to
Fortunately you can build a case-insensitive file system on a mac, within a
file. Disk Utility lets you make a filesystem in a file, and you can click
"case-sensitive". Big win, and though you have to size the FS ahead, it's
also nice to have my 9vx install all in one disk file for moving to othe
I regularly build kernels and full bins for arm on 9vx. the biggest
issue with osx is when you install 9vx on a case-insenstive file
system: things like /bin/Kill and /bin/kill don't quite work out.
ron
On Apr 7, 2011, at 1:34 PM, com...@panix.com (Greg Comeau) wrote:
2) If I recall as it was installed a while ago it came with 8c/8l and
respective includes/libs already available. However, things like
5c and its requirements do not seem to be available by default.
What's the easiest way to
> 1) If it is upgraded to latest version of Snow Leopard (I think 10.6.3?),
>will anything regarding 9vx.OSX break?
As far as I can tell, 9vx works fine on MacOSX 10.6.7.
> 2) If I recall as it was installed a while ago it came with 8c/8l and
>respective includes/libs already available. However, things like
>5c and its requirements do not seem to be available by default.
>What's the easiest way to get the binaries and end-user install tree
>for the
30 matches
Mail list logo
