Re: [9fans] 9vx on x86-64

2008-12-18 Thread prem
Here is the log dump http://rapidshare.com/files/174406971/log.gz.html

Re: [9fans] 9vx on x86-64

2008-12-17 Thread prem
> > That's scary.  Can you send the output of "gcc -v"? > Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: /var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-4.3.2/work/gcc-4.3.2/ configure --prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/ 4.3.2 --includedir=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.

Re: [9fans] 9vx on x86-64

2008-12-15 Thread Russ Cox
>> 9vx -PSX 2>&1 | cat >log > this creates a log of 138 MB :( (19MB gzipped) 19 MB gzipped doesn't sound so bad. Can you send it to me (not to 9fans) as an attachment, or put it up somewhere that I can fetch it from? > However, I think I solved it without actually solving it, > gcc flags changed

Re: [9fans] 9vx on x86-64

2008-12-15 Thread Russ Cox
> gcc -m64 -c -nostdinc -Ilibvxc/include -g -O3 -MD -std=gnu99 -I. -fno- > stack-protector -m80387 -mfp-ret-in-387 -o libvxc/abort.o libvxc/ > abort.c It looks like you edited the VX32_CC line to say gcc -m64. That's wrong. $(VX32_CC) is supposed to be an i386 ELF compiler. You should be able to

Re: [9fans] 9vx on x86-64

2008-12-15 Thread simplicity
It seems not working on LFS64 (pure-64 linux.from scratch) vx64? bash-3.2$ make gcc -m64 -c -nostdinc -Ilibvxc/include -g -O3 -MD -std=gnu99 -I. -fno- stack-protector -m80387 -mfp-ret-in-387 -o libvxc/abort.o libvxc/ abort.c gcc -m64 -c -nostdinc -Ilibvxc/include -g -O3 -MD -std=gnu99 -I. -fno

Re: [9fans] 9vx on x86-64

2008-12-15 Thread prem
> 9vx -PSX >log 2>&1 I just executed 9vx -P -S -X -r -u glenda and pasted what was written on the linux console. > 9vx -PSX 2>&1 | cat >log this creates a log of 138 MB :( (19MB gzipped) However, I think I solved it without actually solving it, gcc flags changed from -g -03 to -g, it works like

Re: [9fans] 9vx on x86-64

2008-12-12 Thread Russ Cox
> Aborted, here is alog with -P -S -X > > reate new cpu: kprocq.n1 nrunproc0 > cpu0: ready 2 *x11*; wakeup kproc cpus It seems a little odd that the log starts with a partial word. It is posible that if you did 9vx -PSX >log 2>&1 that somehow the fd offsets for 1 and 2

Re: [9fans] 9vx on x86-64

2008-12-12 Thread prem
On Dec 11, 7:08 pm, r...@swtch.com (Russ Cox) wrote: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:04 AM, simplicity wrote: > > On Dec 9, 6:45 pm, r...@swtch.com (Russ Cox) wrote: > >> 9vx now builds and runs on Ubuntu Linux x86-64, > >> and hopefully other Linuxes as well. > >> It also runs gs and ape/psh correctl

Re: [9fans] 9vx on x86-64

2008-12-12 Thread prem
On Dec 9, 9:45 am, r...@swtch.com (Russ Cox) wrote: > 9vx now builds and runs on Ubuntu Linux x86-64, > and hopefully other Linuxes as well. > It also runs gs and ape/psh correctly. > I haven't built new binaries nor a new distribution. > Soon; perhaps tomorrow. > > Russ Pulled latest sources from

Re: [9fans] 9vx on x86-64

2008-12-11 Thread Devon H. O'Dell
2008/12/11 Russ Cox : > On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:04 AM, simplicity wrote: >> On Dec 9, 6:45 pm, r...@swtch.com (Russ Cox) wrote: >>> 9vx now builds and runs on Ubuntu Linux x86-64, >>> and hopefully other Linuxes as well. >>> It also runs gs and ape/psh correctly. >>> I haven't built new binaries

Re: [9fans] 9vx on x86-64

2008-12-11 Thread Russ Cox
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:04 AM, simplicity wrote: > On Dec 9, 6:45 pm, r...@swtch.com (Russ Cox) wrote: >> 9vx now builds and runs on Ubuntu Linux x86-64, >> and hopefully other Linuxes as well. >> It also runs gs and ape/psh correctly. >> I haven't built new binaries nor a new distribution. >> S

Re: [9fans] 9vx on x86-64

2008-12-11 Thread simplicity
On Dec 9, 6:45 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Russ Cox) wrote: > 9vx now builds and runs on Ubuntu Linux x86-64, > and hopefully other Linuxes as well. > It also runs gs and ape/psh correctly. > I haven't built new binaries nor a new distribution. > Soon; perhaps tomorrow. > > Russ please give it to me :)