Re: [9fans] moving 9fans to new server, but still 9fans@9fans.net

2019-10-24 Thread vp
>> Does 9fans-requ...@9fans.net still work for subscription? > > It does not; not at the moment. I got a note stating this will stay true indefinitely. In Topicbox' defense their marketing line is "Group email for teams", so saying it is not a very good mailing list package wouldn't be fair. --

Re: [9fans] moving 9fans to new server, but still 9fans@9fans.net

2019-10-24 Thread Anthony Sorace
Archived-At is from RFC 5064. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5064 The weird "=?UTF-8?B?" is an "Encoded Word", per RFC 2047. Email headers are defined to be 7-bit ASCII (yes, still); 2047 provides a way to encode other characters in email headers. Mind you, it looks like all the actual

Re: [9fans] moving 9fans to new server, but still 9fans@9fans.net

2019-10-24 Thread vp
> Does 9fans-requ...@9fans.net still work for subscription? It does not; not at the moment. I complained about it and the issue has been brought to Topicbox team's attention. -- kvik -- 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T863

Re: [9fans] moving 9fans to new server, but still 9fans@9fans.net

2019-10-24 Thread Fazlul Shahriar
9fans > on a self-hosted Mailman on a VM instance, with a spam blocking service in > front. > > I've been working with Calvin Morrison of Fastmail on moving 9fans over to > Fastmail's hosted mailing list service, Topicbox. > > The list address remains 9fans@9fans.

Re: [9fans] Re: moving 9fans to new server, but still 9fans@9fans.net

2019-10-23 Thread Calvin Morrison
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019, at 8:03 AM, hiro wrote: > this is the case on any other mailing lists or only a topicbox-internal > standard... Quite right. RFC2369 describes most of the standard headers you'll be used to. However, I'm not aware of a permalink to web archives for each individual post. htt

Re: [9fans] Re: moving 9fans to new server, but still 9fans@9fans.net

2019-10-23 Thread Ethan Gardener
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019, at 8:38 AM, Anthony Martin wrote: > Ethan Gardener once said: > > As for the footer, I'm sure I'll be glad to have the permalink in every > > email, and it's not in the headers. > > > > [...] > > > > Permalink: > > https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T73a7388a716e3644-M3

Re: [9fans] Re: moving 9fans to new server, but still 9fans@9fans.net

2019-10-23 Thread hiro
btw. even though i dislike the links in the content of the message i like the idea of this header to make the mail accessible in a global namespace. and wondering if this is the case on any other mailing lists or only a topicbox-internal standard... -- 9fans

Re: [9fans] Re: moving 9fans to new server, but still 9fans@9fans.net

2019-10-23 Thread Anthony Martin
Ethan Gardener once said: > As for the footer, I'm sure I'll be glad to have the permalink in every > email, and it's not in the headers. > > [...] > > Permalink: > https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T73a7388a716e3644-M377ada983df012733fe78595 It is in the headers: Archived-At:

Re: [9fans] Re: moving 9fans to new server, but still 9fans@9fans.net

2019-10-19 Thread Ethan Gardener
Glad the changeover was successful. :) On Fri, Oct 11, 2019, at 8:14 PM, hiro wrote: > i received a lot of html here. > > in addition to the original html sent by the authors there is now even > more html stuff, e.g. those footers: > 9fans / 9fans / see discussions + participants + delivery opti

Re: [9fans] moving 9fans to new server, but still 9fans@9fans.net

2019-10-14 Thread Federico Benavento
Damn, my first post was more than 15 years ago, we are not as young as we used to. —- Federico G. Benavento benave...@gmail.com -- 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T73a7388a716e3644-Mf8a933bffa7997a46fe8ff72 Delivery opt

Re: [9fans] Re: moving 9fans to new server, but still 9fans@9fans.net

2019-10-14 Thread Skip Tavakkolian
If you can remember how long ago it was, you're not old enough :) On Mon, Oct 14, 2019 at 1:35 PM James A. Robinson wrote: > > For fun, here's my first mail to 9fans. > > Wow, this makes me feel my age. I see your first email to the ilst > was 23 years ago and mine was 21 years ago! -

Re: [9fans] Re: moving 9fans to new server, but still 9fans@9fans.net

2019-10-14 Thread James A. Robinson
> For fun, here's my first mail to 9fans. Wow, this makes me feel my age. I see your first email to the ilst was 23 years ago and mine was 21 years ago! -- 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T73a7388a716e3644-M239143a07611e83c

Re: [9fans] Re: moving 9fans to new server, but still 9fans@9fans.net

2019-10-14 Thread Darren Wise
Roger wilko, over! ;) Seems to be working:D On 14 October 2019 16:56:12 BST, "Aram Hăvărneanu" wrote: > Test. > > -- > Aram Hăvărneanu -- 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T73a7388a716e3644-M17aad7673fa8fb4e33aacdc2 Deliver

Re: [9fans] Re: moving 9fans to new server, but still 9fans@9fans.net

2019-10-14 Thread Aram Hăvărneanu
Test. -- Aram Hăvărneanu -- 9fans: 9fans Permalink: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/T73a7388a716e3644-M4477ede150279a780653725c Delivery options: https://9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans/subscription

[9fans] Re: moving 9fans to new server, but still 9fans@9fans.net

2019-10-14 Thread Anthony Martin
Anthony Martin once said: > This is missing the dozen or so messages from the beginning of the > mailing list in April 1993. I have them in mbox format if you are > interested in adding them to your archive. Also, the following messages in the Topicbox archive are duplicates. They are identical e

Re: [9fans] Re: moving 9fans to new server, but still 9fans@9fans.net

2019-10-14 Thread Anthony Martin
hiro <23h...@gmail.com> once said: > there's also a plaintext version of this, adding 5 lines to every > email. all this seems quite redundent if you ask me. And it's all in duplicated in the headers. Can it be turned off? Anthony -- 9fans: 9fans Permali

[9fans] Re: moving 9fans to new server, but still 9fans@9fans.net

2019-10-14 Thread Anthony Martin
Russ Cox once said: > The 9fans archives now > hosted at Topicbox contain all the messages formerly at > 9fans.net/archive (before that machine went down), dating all the way > back to July 1993. This is missing the dozen or so messages from the beginning

Re: [9fans] Re: moving 9fans to new server, but still 9fans@9fans.net

2019-10-11 Thread Lucio De Re
On 10/11/19, hiro <23h...@gmail.com> wrote: > [ ... ] > there's also a plaintext version of this, adding 5 lines to every > email. all this seems quite redundent if you ask me. > I can live with this... Many thanks, Russ. Lucio. -- 9fans: 9fans Permalink:

Re: [9fans] Re: moving 9fans to new server, but still 9fans@9fans.net

2019-10-11 Thread hiro
i received a lot of html here. in addition to the original html sent by the authors there is now even more html stuff, e.g. those footers: 9fans / 9fans / see discussions + participants + delivery options Permalink there's also a plaintext version of this, adding 5 lines to every email. all this

Re: [9fans] Re: moving 9fans to new server, but still 9fans@9fans.net

2019-10-11 Thread Rodrigo G . López
i know i'm late to the party, but shouldn't 9fans be running on a 9 machine/cluster? On Fri, Oct 11, 2019, 7:35 PM Russ Cox wrote: > By all appearances, 9fans mail is flowing through Topicbox now. > > The 9fans archives now hosted > at Topicbox contain a

Re: [9fans] Re: moving 9fans to new server, but still 9fans@9fans.net

2019-10-11 Thread Calvin Morrison
Message Recieved! happy trails. Calvin On Fri, 11 Oct 2019 at 13:37, Russ Cox wrote: > > By all appearances, 9fans mail is flowing through Topicbox now. > > The 9fans archives now hosted at Topicbox contain all the messages > formerly at 9fans.net/archive (before that machine went down), dating

Re: [9fans] Re: moving 9fans to new server, but still 9fans@9fans.net

2019-10-11 Thread Don Bailey
+1 On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:37 AM Russ Cox wrote: > By all appearances, 9fans mail is flowing through Topicbox now. > > The 9fans archives now hosted > at Topicbox contain all the messages > formerly at 9fans.net/archive (before that machine went down)

[9fans] Re: moving 9fans to new server, but still 9fans@9fans.net

2019-10-11 Thread Russ Cox
By all appearances, 9fans mail is flowing through Topicbox now. The 9fans archives now hosted at Topicbox contain all the messages formerly at 9fans.net/archive (before that machine went down), dating all the way back to July 1993. For fun, here's my first

[9fans] Re: moving 9fans to new server, but still 9fans@9fans.net

2019-10-11 Thread Russ Cox
#x27;ve been working with Calvin Morrison of Fastmail on moving 9fans over to > Fastmail's hosted mailing list service, Topicbox. > > The list address remains 9fans@9fans.net. > Searchable archives will be hosted at 9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans. > > I think everything is re

[9fans] moving 9fans to new server, but still 9fans@9fans.net

2019-10-11 Thread Russ Cox
he list address remains 9fans@9fans.net. Searchable archives will be hosted at 9fans.topicbox.com/groups/9fans. I think everything is ready to cut over, and I plan to try after sending this message. All addresses that were receiving mail from the old system should start receiving mail from Topicbo

[9fans] 9fans@9fans.net

2010-03-07 Thread - Choc -

Re: [9fans] 9fans.net/archive/ google index

2009-08-17 Thread Steve Kostecke
On 2009-08-17, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote: >> interestingly, googling for this with >>        site:9fans.net/archive/2009/08 PAT >> returns nothing. > > I've seen these kind of problems a lot. I have looked around, I > searched for any misconfigured robot file, but not having found any

[9fans] 9fans.net/archive/ google index

2009-08-16 Thread hiro
> interestingly, googling for this with >        site:9fans.net/archive/2009/08 PAT > returns nothing. I've seen these kind of problems a lot. I have looked around, I searched for any misconfigured robot file, but not having found any I am left wondering. Why doesn't google index our archive? Even

Re: [9fans] 9fans.net/archive

2008-08-05 Thread erik quanstrom
> Sequential messages with the same > subject get grouped so that the subject > is given only once, but there is no > reordering of messages. > > Now that you know that, do you still want > the old, unthreaded view? I can't see that > it has any advantage over the current one. okay. that makes

Re: [9fans] 9fans.net/archive

2008-08-05 Thread Russ Cox
> the threaded view is pretty useful but a good > bit of the time, i skim the list archives in order. > is there any way to get the old, unthreaded view? Sequential messages with the same subject get grouped so that the subject is given only once, but there is no reordering of messages. Now that

Re: [9fans] 9fans.net/archive

2008-08-05 Thread Uriel
Ah, the old format was very nice, but to have threading at last is very nice too, but I agree having both would be best. Is the code used to generate the 9fans.net web archives somewhere? The output is much better than any other mailing list web archive I have seen. uriel On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 1

[9fans] 9fans.net/archive

2008-08-05 Thread erik quanstrom
the threaded view is pretty useful but a good bit of the time, i skim the list archives in order. is there any way to get the old, unthreaded view? - erik