> what problem are you trying to solve?
>
> the limit would check only that the right number of
> argument bytes are consumed, but not that they are
> interpreted correctly. print("%s %d", 1, "hello") would
> still crash, as would print("%s", 1, "hello").
>
> #pragma varargck is more precise and
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 6:56 AM, erik quanstrom wrote:
> and i wondered why kenc doesn't add an argument
> count before the first vararg. (bwc pointed out
> that the address following the last vararg would be
> more useful.) va_* could be updated to deal with
> the silent extra and abort on acces
as i was drifting off to sleep the other night,
i was wondering about varargs. (clearly, it's
time for a vacation.)
and i wondered why kenc doesn't add an argument
count before the first vararg. (bwc pointed out
that the address following the last vararg would be
more useful.) va_* could be upd
