OK, found this: http://www.math.uni.wroc.pl/~hebisch/tex/
7 years old but 7 years newer than the plan 9 version. I have mailed
the author to see how it is going.
compiles (quickly!) and runs under ape.
ron
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 5:40 PM, erik quanstrom wrote:
>
> i just hate how the rush to use every last new feature
> leads to things like gnu configure and autotools, and
> ancient warhorses like tex no longer running.
I last built the C version of TeX quite some time ago. At the time, it
was quite
> I last built the C version of TeX quite some time ago. At the time, it
> was quite portable.
>
> Imagine my surprise to go to the new stuff and find ... Makefile.in
> ... configure.
>
> I had no idea. So much for a new port :-)
modern tex reminds me of vger from star trek. so much
encrusting
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 19:40, erik quanstrom wrote:
> On Mon Oct 5 20:18:06 EDT 2009, rminn...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I'm just now looking at tex on plan 9 and finding that a 14-year old
>> release is not that useful with the newer packages.
>>
>> Has anyone tried newer stuff at all?
>
> i just hate
On Mon Oct 5 20:18:06 EDT 2009, rminn...@gmail.com wrote:
> I'm just now looking at tex on plan 9 and finding that a 14-year old
> release is not that useful with the newer packages.
>
> Has anyone tried newer stuff at all?
i just hate how the rush to use every last new feature
leads to things l
I'm just now looking at tex on plan 9 and finding that a 14-year old
release is not that useful with the newer packages.
Has anyone tried newer stuff at all?
thanks
ron
