> Is this just 'listen -N' in fossilcons(8)?
> Given that listen and users are fossil-wide, rather
> than fsys-wide, it seems like duplicating what
> sources is doing at a "normal" Plan 9 installation
> would involve running a second fossil. If -N were
> on open (which seems reasonably close to ope
// Sources is a bit different: it doesn't require
// authentication, but it will accept it.
Is this just 'listen -N' in fossilcons(8)?
Given that listen and users are fossil-wide, rather
than fsys-wide, it seems like duplicating what
sources is doing at a "normal" Plan 9 installation
would involv
> Although, on a second though, if sources.cs.bell-labs.com doesn't
> require authentication it probably should reply with Rerror
> to a Tauth message. And it doesn't:
>term% aux/9pcon -n tcp!sources.cs.bell-labs.com
>Tversion 8192 9P2000
> -> Tversion tag 65535 msize 8192 version '
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 12:51 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hello
>
> Access to sources is anonymous since a couple of years (try 9fs sources)
Although, on a second though, if sources.cs.bell-labs.com doesn't
require authentication it probably should reply with Rerror
to a Tauth message. And it
Hi
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 12:51 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> hello
>
> Access to sources is anonymous since a couple of years (try 9fs sources),
Thanks!!! mount -n solved my issue 100%.
> you only need an account if you're going to write in sources (contrib/). I
> think if you want an acco
hello
Access to sources is anonymous since a couple of years (try 9fs sources), you
only need an account if you're going to write in sources (contrib/). I think if
you want an account to write there, you should contact someone at the labs
(Geoff i think) or 9trouble.
slds.
gabi
> Hi guys
Hi guys!
Amazingly enough I've never had a chance to create an
account for myself @sources.cs.bell-labs.com. And now
that I finally decided to do so, the URL:
http://plan9.bell-labs.com/plan9/newaccount.html
seems to be gone.
So, the question is -- how do I set things up so that
$ 9fs sour
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 4:57 AM, erik quanstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> appears not to be in dns. did i miss a change?
nope, hang in there. It's not you.
ron
appears not to be in dns. did i miss a change?
- erik
