Re: [9fans] sharing the ndb(6) database

2010-09-07 Thread erik quanstrom
> Now, the rest of the network also needs much > of the same info as the auth server, in order to > easily call each computer by sysname, etc.. > This means that when a new node is added to > the Plan 9 network, changes will be needed > to be made in two places: the main network's > /lib/ndb/local

Re: [9fans] sharing the ndb(6) database

2010-09-07 Thread Lucio De Re
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 09:09:11AM +0200, Lucio De Re wrote: > On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 11:45:01PM -0700, Akshat Kumar wrote: > > > > I'm using Google mail servers to send > > mail - this shouldn't be in the RBL. > > > Damn right. The criterion for dumping IP addresses into my private RBL > is th

Re: [9fans] sharing the ndb(6) database

2010-09-07 Thread Lucio De Re
On Mon, Sep 06, 2010 at 11:45:01PM -0700, Akshat Kumar wrote: > > I'm using Google mail servers to send > mail - this shouldn't be in the RBL. > Damn right. The criterion for dumping IP addresses into my private RBL is that an attempt was made to send mail to a local, unregistered address. In th

Re: [9fans] sharing the ndb(6) database

2010-09-06 Thread Akshat Kumar
Hi Lucio, Thanks for your message! I tried to reply to you directly, but got the following error when I sent you my message: > Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: > > lu...@proxima.alt.za > > Technical details of permanent failure: > Google tried to deliver your messag

[9fans] sharing the ndb(6) database

2010-09-06 Thread Akshat Kumar
My new auth server is completely standalone: it uses the kfs file system and boots off its own (solid state) disk. The rest of the network, for which it performs the authentication tasks, is based on a separate file server node. The auth server also runs dhcpd, tftpd, and a dns server. As such, its