The performance was enjoyable indeed, and interesting. Thanks :-) Although,
I bet you can get better results in an easier way with VST. No tool is
universal.
Just in case, the video wouldn't load even with the latest version of Adobe
Flash Player on Opera (some problem with Vimeo, presumably).
> This may not be your cup of tea or be artsy enough for you
> but check out what happens when tech meets arts:
>
> http://impromptu.moso.com.au/gallery.html
i enjoyed this. thanks.
On Thu, 03 Sep 2009 07:29:53 BST Eris Discordia
wrote:
>
> I mean, I never got past SICP Chapter 1 because that first chapter got me
> asking, "why this much hassle?"
May be you had an impedance mismatch with SICP?
> P.S. I'm leaving. You may now remove your
> arts-and-letters-cootie-protec
> P.S. I'm leaving. You may now remove your
> arts-and-letters-cootie-protection suits and go back to normal tech-savvy
> attire ;-)
that's okay. given the adverts^wposts on the list today, we may just maintain
our choate quota without you.
- erik
Killing parens won't make you an adult :-)
Killing the paren(t)s is the hobbyist(eenager)'s radical response to
existential why's that arise as the world of exper(adul)ts opens up before
them and regularities in there are found to be essentially conventional
rather than rational or natural.
I use chibi at work; s'not bad considering the size, & certainly better than
tinyscheme. I currently use a custom dialect for new stuff, but the old is
either Chibi or Gauche.
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 11:13 AM, David Leimbach wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Iruata Souza wrote:
>
>> O
On Wed, 02 Sep 2009 12:32:53 BST Eris Discordia
wrote:
> Although, you may be better off reading SICP "as intended," and use MIT
> Scheme on either Windows or a *NIX. The book (and the freaking language) is
> already hard/unusual enough for one to not want to get confused by
> implementation
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 7:30 AM, Iruata Souza wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Eris Discordia
> wrote:
> > Although, you may be better off reading SICP "as intended," and use MIT
> > Scheme on either Windows or a *NIX. The book (and the freaking language)
> is
> > already hard/unusual enou
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 8:32 AM, Eris Discordia wrote:
> Although, you may be better off reading SICP "as intended," and use MIT
> Scheme on either Windows or a *NIX. The book (and the freaking language) is
> already hard/unusual enough for one to not want to get confused by
> implementation quirks.
> number of schemes > 4
>
> http://www.plan9.bell-labs.com/wiki/plan9/Contrib_index/
One that's not in the contrib tree is s9fes (Scheme 9 From
Empty Space).
BLS
Although, you may be better off reading SICP "as intended," and use MIT
Scheme on either Windows or a *NIX. The book (and the freaking language) is
already hard/unusual enough for one to not want to get confused by
implementation quirks. (Kill the paren!)
--On Wednesday, September 02, 2009 10:
number of schemes > 4
http://www.plan9.bell-labs.com/wiki/plan9/Contrib_index/
maybe one is what you are looking for
there is also a gsoc project, search 9fans for more details
http://9fans.net/archive/
xiangyu wrote:
HI,everyone:
Has anyone ported scheme into plan 9 ? or is there som
HI,everyone:
Has anyone ported scheme into plan 9 ? or is there some scheme
implementation existence on plan 9 ? i want to learn SCIP
recently ,but i can't find a scheme in plan 9 . so ask ..
looking forward for the answer as soon as possible...
thanks first.
13 matches
Mail list logo
