On Dec 4, 1:17Â am, andy753...@gmail.com (Andy Spencer) wrote:
> Hey weakish, I've been working on a similar syntax file for a little
> while but I guess I forgot to post it to 9fans.. I've been going off
> rc(1) from plan9port so the syntax might be a little different depending
> on which version
On Dec 4, 12:06Â am, jaketodd...@gmail.com (Jacob Todd) wrote:
>
> Which rc port? There's [1], which I thought I read people bickering about how
> it was different than Plan 9's rc.
> [1]http://rc-shell.slackmatic.org/
> --
> Jake Todd
Yes, this version. In fact there are not too much difference
> This vim syntax file is made for the rc for unix port. Though I think
> it will also be helpful for rc on plan9 since the syntax is quite
> similar.
Hey weakish, I've been working on a similar syntax file for a little
while but I guess I forgot to post it to 9fans.. I've been going off
rc(1) fr
On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 12:34:47PM +, weakish wrote:
> You can get it at vim.org:
>
> http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=2880
>
> This vim syntax file is made for the rc for unix port. Though I think
> it will also be helpful for rc on plan9 since the syntax is quite
> similar.
You can get it at vim.org:
http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=2880
This vim syntax file is made for the rc for unix port. Though I think
it will also be helpful for rc on plan9 since the syntax is quite
similar.
The bugs of rc on plan9 I can think of:
* 'not' in 'if not' won't hig
