Re: [9fans] plan9port openbsd 4.4

2009-01-29 Thread Mechiel Lukkien
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 01:01:55PM -0500, Anthony Sorace wrote: > if you want to work on it some, this message talks about getting > inferno working on OpenBSD using the rthreads library (the pending > replacement for the userland threads russ talked about): > > http://www.xs4all.nl/~mechiel/infer

Re: [9fans] plan9port openbsd 4.4

2009-01-29 Thread Fernan Bolando
Hi all I just everybody to know that...As usual Russ was right. The occasional burp happens when acme tries to fork a new thread. now I am back to using drawterm+qemu on openbsd fernan On 1/27/09, Fernan Bolando wrote: >> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Russ Cox wrote: >>> The plan9port code

Re: [9fans] plan9port openbsd 4.4

2009-01-26 Thread Fernan Bolando
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Russ Cox wrote: >> The plan9port code depends on the operating system's pthreads >> being real kernel-level threads, not a fake user-level simulation. >> The user-level simulations are not good enough, because >> on the x86 they cut corners and use the stack poin

Re: [9fans] plan9port openbsd 4.4

2009-01-26 Thread Iruata Souza
can't remember on 4.4, but 4.3 did run acme fine. On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 2:04 PM, Russ Cox wrote: > The plan9port code depends on the operating system's pthreads > being real kernel-level threads, not a fake user-level simulation. > The user-level simulations are not good enough, because > on th

Re: [9fans] plan9port openbsd 4.4

2009-01-26 Thread Anthony Sorace
if you want to work on it some, this message talks about getting inferno working on OpenBSD using the rthreads library (the pending replacement for the userland threads russ talked about): http://www.xs4all.nl/~mechiel/inferno/openbsd43-old.html you could likely follow a similar path for p9p if y

Re: [9fans] plan9port openbsd 4.4

2009-01-26 Thread Russ Cox
The plan9port code depends on the operating system's pthreads being real kernel-level threads, not a fake user-level simulation. The user-level simulations are not good enough, because on the x86 they cut corners and use the stack pointer to locate the thread-local state. The Plan 9 threaded progr

Re: [9fans] plan9port openbsd 4.4

2009-01-25 Thread sqweek
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:34 AM, Fernan Bolando wrote: > rio seems to work fine, but I have been getting a few 9serve.core dumps. > > I also get the following when running acme > _procstart rfork_thread: Resource temporarily unavailable > Abort trap > and few broken pipes message. Hm, does

Re: [9fans] plan9port openbsd 4.4

2009-01-25 Thread andrey mirtchovski
> rio seems to work fine, but I have been getting a few 9serve.core dumps. that makes sense: p9p's rio (used to be 9wm) is written with X-windows in mind. it's not a Plan 9 app.

Re: [9fans] plan9port openbsd 4.4

2009-01-25 Thread Fernan Bolando
On 1/26/09, Iruata Souza wrote: > could you send me the core file? are you linking with rthreads? > > iru > > On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Fernan Bolando > wrote: >> Hi all >> >> I recently installed plan9port on an openbsd pc in order gain access >> to acme and other tools. >> >> rio seems

Re: [9fans] plan9port openbsd 4.4

2009-01-25 Thread Iruata Souza
could you send me the core file? are you linking with rthreads? iru On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 11:34 PM, Fernan Bolando wrote: > Hi all > > I recently installed plan9port on an openbsd pc in order gain access > to acme and other tools. > > rio seems to work fine, but I have been getting a few 9serv

[9fans] plan9port openbsd 4.4

2009-01-25 Thread Fernan Bolando
Hi all I recently installed plan9port on an openbsd pc in order gain access to acme and other tools. rio seems to work fine, but I have been getting a few 9serve.core dumps. I also get the following when running acme _procstart rfork_thread: Resource temporarily unavailable Abort trap and fe