> I can run "9 9term", but what happens when you run something like "9vx -u
> glenda -r /some/very/long/path/" and then run "!9vx" the next time to rerun
> the last command starting with ? It probably runs the 9'th command in the
> history. Sorry I was not clear. I consider this a minor his is a
On Mon, 14 Jun 2010 21:10:38 +, hiro <23h...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> I tried running 9 9term in bash and had no problems.
> Perhaps you haven't set up your $PATH correctly?
I can run "9 9term", but what happens when you run something like "9vx -u
glenda -r /some/very/long/path/" and then run
I tried running 9 9term in bash and had no problems.
Perhaps you haven't set up your $PATH correctly?
Would a phonetic morphology à la the ceePlusPlus of wiki would suffice
for our lexically challenged friends?
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 8:47 AM, EBo wrote:
>
>> your shell is broken. [0-9] are perfectly valid anywhere in a unix file
>> name.
>
> does bash completion work for you on *anything*? Or does it get confused
> thinking that you are specifying a previous command (!### in the history)?
> Yes, a fil
> does bash completion work for you on *anything*?
that's a purely theoretical question. i use rc.
- erik
> your shell is broken. [0-9] are perfectly valid anywhere in a unix file
> name.
does bash completion work for you on *anything*? Or does it get confused
thinking that you are specifying a previous command (!### in the history)?
Yes, a file/script named [0-9]* is valid, but still breaks thing
> I've been catching a little flack off and on about the Plan 9's naming
> convention of adding a '9' in front of program names. I've also noticed
> that using emulators, on the linux side, prefixing a 9 breaks history
> utilization functionality in most of the shells I use.
your shell is broke
>Is it more reasonable in this case to name the executive vx32 instead of
>9vx since it is a plan 9 emulator for linux?
not really, because vx32 is the library, and 9vx is just one sample application.
(there are others.)
I do not mean to feed any trolls with this one, but I need to know how
people what some of this addressed in the future.
I've been catching a little flack off and on about the Plan 9's naming
convention of adding a '9' in front of program names. I've also noticed
that using emulators, on the linu
10 matches
Mail list logo
